THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEACHER FEEDBACK TECHNIQUE TOWARD STUDENTS WRITING ABILITY (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY AT SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2 METRO)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v4i1.482Keywords:
Teacher Feedback, Writing AbilityAbstract
The objective of this research are to examine whether: 1) there is a different between teacher feedback technique and conventional technique toward students’ writing ability at the first grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Metro and 2) the effectiveness of Teacher Feedback Technique toward students’ writing ability. This method applied in this research was a quasi experimental research. It was conducted at the first grade students of SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Metro. It consists of 90 students in three Classes. The sample of the research were two classes. Sampel penelitian ini adalah kelas X1 dan X2 yang dipilih menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. The data were analyzed by using T-Test with Minitab Version 16 and Normalized Gain Test. Based on the result of data analysis, there are some research findings that can be drawn. They are; 1) there is a different between students’ writing ability tough by using teacher feedback and conventional technique to the students of SMA Muhammadiyah Metro. Teacher feedback technique is more effective than conventional technique toward students writing ability. 2) the level of effectiveness of Teacher Feedback Technique is 0.32 (medium) and Conventional technique is 0.17 (low).
References
Byrne, Donn. 1997. Teaching Writing
Skills (Longman Handbooks for
Language Teachers). Edinburgh
Gate. Longman.
Gay, L.R. 1992. Education Research.
Competencies for Analysis and
Application. New York:
Macmilan Publishing Company.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to Teach Writing. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.
______, 2009. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Edinburgh. Pearson.
Heaton. 1998. Writing English Language
Test. Lognman Handbooks for
language Teacher. Hongkong:
Longman Group Ltd.
Hernowo., 2003. Quantum Writing.
Bandung: Mizan Learning
Center.
Hyland, K. and F. Hyland. 2006.
Feedback on Second Language
Students’ Writing. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, Ken. 2003. Second Language
Writing. New York. Cambridge
University Press.
Johnson, Burke and Christensen, Larry.
2000. Educational Research.
Quantitative and Qualitative
Approach. New York: A Pearson
Education Company.
Keh, Claudia L. 1990. Feedback in the Writing Process: a Model and Methods for Implementation.
ELT Journal. Volume 44/4
October 1990. Oxford University
Press.
Meltzer. 2002. The Relationship between Mathematich Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gain in
Physics: A Posible “Hidden
Variable in Diagnostic Pretest
Score”. American JJournal
Physics.
Murcia, Celce, Marianne and Elite
Olshtein. 2000. Discourse and
Context in Language Teaching.
New York. Cambridge
University Press.
Nunan, David. 1998. Second Language
Teaching and Learning. Boston:
Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
______,2003. Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: Mc. Graw Hill.
Reid, M. Joy. 1993. Teaching ESL
Writing. New Jersey. Prentice
Hall, Inc.
Spratt, Mary and Alan. 2005. The
Teaching Knowledge Test Course
(TKT). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Srichanyachon, Napaporn. 2012.
Teacher Written Feedback for L2
Learners’ Writing Development.
Silpakorn University Journal of
Social Sciences, Humanities, and
Arts. Vol 12 (1): 7-17
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian
Pendidikan Pendekatan
Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.
Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ur, P. 1996. A course in Language
Teaching Practice Theory.
Cambridge Teacher Training and
Development. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Zainurrahman. 2010. Peer Feedback:
Students’ Narrative Writing
Development and Students’
Response (A Case Study in an
ESL Writing Classroom).
Unpublished Thesis. Bandung.
UPI Bandung.
