Analisis Kebutuhan Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa Jurusan Ekonomi Syariah

Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Ekonomi Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Authors

  • Widhiya Ninsiana Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro
  • Agus Trioni Nawa Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/tapis.v3i1.1514

Keywords:

Analisis Kebutuhan, Bahasa Inggris, Research and Development, Ekonomi Syariah, Need Analysis, Learning Analysis, English Language Learning, Islamic Economics

Abstract

This developmental research was conducted to compose the learning material specifically for Islamic Economics students of Economics and Islamic Business Faculty. Basically, there are differences between Conventional Economics and Islamic Economics. Their striking differences lie in several terms used for mentioning practices in their implementations.

The method used adopted from the steps of product development developed by Sugiono[1]. Before composing the development design, researchers conducted 2 aspects of analysis, namely target needs and learning needs which were developed into questionnaires to investigate listening, speaking, reading, writing, grammar, and vocabulary.

The data analysis resulted that there were no significant differences needed among six linguistic components above. However, it needed accentuation directly on all four linguistic skills (listening, speaking, reading, writing). Besides, the learning technique used during the English learning process is Cooperative Learning.

[1] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015), h. 409.

References

Darici, Alper. “The Importance of Needs Analysis in Materials Development.” Issues in Materials Development, 2016, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-432-9_3.

Gillies, Robyn M. “Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 41, no. 3 (2016): 3. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3.

Giroux, Henry A. Teachers as Intellectual - toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. New York: Bergin & Garvey, 1988.

Hani’ah. “Pemberlajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Perguruan Tinggi Sebagai Penguatan Jati Diri Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Konteks Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean.” Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, n.d. http://s3pbi.fkip.uns.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Haniah.pdf.

“Hasil Pencarian - KBBI Daring.” Accessed October 21, 2018. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/bunga.

Hutchinson, Tom, and Alan Waters. English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Jacobs, George M. “Ten Strengths of How Teachers Do Cooperative Learning.” In He 11th Malaysia International Conference On English Language Teaching (MICELT 2016), Vol. 4. 1. Lumut: Universiti Putra Malaysia, 2016. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573761.pdf.

Lidyana, Novita. “Perbedaan Ekonomi Konvensional dan Ekonomi Islam.” Iqtisodiyah : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam 1, no. 1 (August 20, 2016): 67–80.

MacKenzie, Ian. English for Business Studies: A Course for Business Studies and Economics Students. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Meredith D.Gall, Joyce P. Gall, Walter R. Borg. Educational Research an Introduction. 7th ed. New York: Pearson Education, Inc, 2003.

Siswo, Dwi. “Sekolah Dalam Tantangan Abad Ke-21.” In Politik Kebijakan Nasional Dalam Tantangan. Yogyakarta, 2013.

Soltis, Jonas F. Aims of Education Teacher College Press. Columbia: Columbian University, 2000.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.

Sumarni, Woro. “The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Implementation of Project Based Learning: A Review.” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 4, no. 3 (March 2015): 478–84.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30