Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT) dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Bahasa Inggris Tingkat SMA Kota Metro dan Dampaknya terhadap Masyarakat Ekonomi Asean (MEA)

Authors

  • Widhiya Ninsiana Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/tapis.v2i1.1163

Keywords:

Teaching Knowledge Test, Pedagogical Competence, English Teacher

Abstract

This study examines the Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT) to increase the English teacher Pedagogical Competence of  senior high school in Metro and Its Impact on the Asean Economic Community (AEC). This purpose of the study are (1) to explain and to describe the Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT) can increase the english teacher pedagogical competence in Metro City; (2) to explain and to describe the Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT) can help the English teacher in developing their competencies in english teaching and learning and its impact on AEC.This study is a qualitative research with analitical approach. The data resources consists of primary and secondary data. The primary data source is the documentation and secondary data is interviews. The techniques data collection in this study are documentation and interview techniques. The data validation is triangulation method by Creswell.The findings of this study are: first, Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT) can increase the teacher pedagogical competence of senior high school in Metro City. It can be seen that the pre-test and post-test TKT result, namely, all participants of TKT get  bandmark 3, and it means is good score. Second, Teaching Knowledge Test can provide a positive contribution in increasing the teacher pedagogical competence. This can be proved from the TKT result, that is, just one participant of TKT gets bandmark 4 with a range of score is 60-80 (very good score), and 4 participants get bandmark 3 with a range of score is 41-60 (good score).Based on the findings of the study concluded that Teaching Knowledge Test (TKT) gives a positive contribution to increase the English teacher pedagogical compentence of senior hight school in Metro city, and they are ready to face of AEC with their to cooperate and collaborate the human resources from abroad.

References

C. Jacob. “Mengajar Berpikir Kritis: Suatu Upaya Meningkatkan Efektivitas Belajar Matematika.” Majalah Ilmiah Matematika Indonesia (Journal of Indonesian Mathematical Society) 6, no. 5 (200AD): 595–98.

Cece Wijaya, and Tabarani Rusyan. Kemampuan Dasar Guru Dalam Proses Belajar – Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda¬karya, 1994.

D. R. Cruickshank. Models for the Preparation of America‟s Teachers. Bloomington: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, 1985.

Henry A Giroux. Teachers as Intellectual - toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. New York: Bergin & Garvey, 1988.

John W Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. California: SAGE Publication, 2009.

Jonas F Soltis. Aims of Education Teacher College Press. Columbia: Teachers College, Columbiam University, 2000.

Marry Spratt, Alan Pulverness, and Melanie Williams. The TKT Teaching Knowledge Test Course; Modul 1, 2 and 3. 2nd ed. Cambridge: University of Cambridge ESOL Examination, n.d.

Putut Wiryawan. “Tantangan Guru Pada Abad Ke – 21 (Dari Perspektif Politik Lokal).” In Proseding Seminar Nasional. Yogyakarta: Universitas Yogyakarta, 2013.

Suparlan. Guru Sebagai Profesi. Yogyakarta: Hikayat, 2000.

Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (n.d.).

UU RI No. 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen dan PP No. 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan (n.d.).

Downloads

Published

2018-08-13