Technology-Based Reading Application on Improving Reading Literacy Level Among Struggling Readers in a Public Elementary School in the Philippines

Authors

  • Mary Jane D. Quimsing San Antonio Elementary School, Santo Tomas, Batangas, Philippines
  • Ruth Ortega-Dela Cruz University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v12i1.7757

Keywords:

literacy level, reading application, struggling readers, technology-based

Abstract

Reading literacy is a fundamental skill essential for academic success and lifelong learning. However, some students in elementary schools face challenges in developing proficient reading skills, leading to academic setbacks. Technology offers innovative solutions to address these challenges and facilitate reading literacy levels among struggling readers. This study assessed the effects of a technology-based reading application READTECH 1.0 on improving the reading literacy level of Struggling Readers in a public elementary school in the Philippines. READTECH 1.0 follows the Analyze, Design, Develop, Implementation, Evaluation (ADDIE) Model in creating learning content. The respondents of this study were 26 Grade Six Struggling Readers. Quantitative methods were used in collecting the data such as conducting pre-and post-reading test assessments. Descriptive Statistics were used to analyze the data and the questionnaires using the five-point Likert Scale. Findings revealed that the implementation of READTECH 1.0 leads to an improvement in the reading literacy level of the Struggling Readers. The integration of technology into education, particularly in the realm of reading, has shown promise in engaging and assisting struggling readers.

 

References

Bermudo, C. (2017). Mental Models: Aid in Improving Reading Comprehension of Grade 6 Struggling Readers

Bukhari, S.S.F. (2019). The Effectiveness of Pre-assessment to Differentiate the Reading Tasks for the Mixed-
Abilities EFL Learners. In: Hidri, S. (eds) English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98533-6_7

Child Hope Philippines. 2021.The Importance of Technology in Philippine Education. Retrieved 20 May 2023 from https://childhope.org.ph/importance-of-technology-in-philippine-education/

Colbert, A., Yee, N., & George, G. (2016). The digital workforce and the workplace of the future. Academy of management journal, 59(3), 731-739.

Department of Education. (2021).Education Technology Unit.AKLATECH 3.0.Retrieved 10 April 2023 from https:// www.facebook.com/depededtech

Dangan, J.P.N.P., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R.A. (2021). Effectiveness of English Learner’s Material in Enhancing Grammatical Competence of Grade 9 Bilingual Students: A Basis for Supplementary Material Development. Asian Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Education, 1 (1), 1-12. http://e-journal.naifaderu.org/index.php/ajmme/article/view/4

Department of Education. (2022) .DepEd Memorandum no.62 Brigada Eskwela Implementing Guidelines. Retrieved from 06 April 2023 https:// www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/DM_s2022_062.pdf

Department of Education. PISA 2018.National Report of the Philippines. Retrieved from 05 May 2023 PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf (deped.gov.ph)

FLAT (Functional Literacy Assessment Tool). 2022.Reading Literacy Assessment. Retrieved 20 October 2022 from https://studylib.net/doc/25586889/wv-brigada-pagbasa-functional-literacy-assessment-tool.pd

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mc. Graw Hill

Heath, C. (2023). What is Purposive Sampling? Retrieved 20 October 2022 from https://dovetail.com/research/purposive-sampling/

Hernando-Malipot, M. (2023). 2022 PISA results a 'clear indication' that PH education system is in ‘worst state’ --- PBEd. National News Report. Manila Bulletin. Retrieved January 18, 2024 from https://mb.com.ph/2023/12/6/2022-pisa-results-a-clear-indication-that-ph-education-system-is-in-worst-state-pb-ed

Hilao-Valencia, P.M., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R.A. (2023). Appreciative inquiry approach and its effects on English oral communication skills of teacher education students. MEXTESOL Journal, 47(1), 1-25. https://www.mextesol.net/journal/index.php?page=journal&id_article=46403

Huang, Y. M., Liao, Y. W., Huang, S. H., & Chen, H. C. (2014). Jigsaw-based cooperative learning approach to
improve learning outcomes for mobile situated learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 128-140. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.1.128

Klimova, B., & Zamborova, K. (2020). Use of mobile applications in developing reading comprehension in second language acquisition—A review study. Education Sciences, 10(12), 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120391

Lopez, M.K.R.R., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R.A. (2022). Gallery Walk technique in enhancing reading comprehension and oral English language proficiency of junior high school students. Waikato Journal of Education, 27(3), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v27i3.813

Luz, M. J. (2007). Literature and Literacy: A Nation of Non-Readers.
https://old.pcij.org/stories/a-nation-of-nonreaders/

Mendoza, K. M. M., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R. A. (2024). Silent and oral reading methods on improving English reading comprehension among generation alpha pupils. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 5 (1), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.202451306

Mohammed, I., & Amponsah, O. (2018). Predominant Factors Contributing to Low Reading Abilities of Pupils at Elsie Lund Basic School in the Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. African Educational Research Journal, 6(4), 273-278. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1208309

Nabor, L.G., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R.A. (2022). Project 555: A silent reading intervention towards an improved reading comprehension in English. Journal of English Education, 7 (2), 36-50. http://usnsj.id/index.php/JEE/article/view/1805/pdf

Nobles, L.M.A.G., & Ortega-Dela Cruz, R.A. (2020). Making Connections: A Metacognitive Teaching Strategy in Enhancing Students’ Reading Comprehension. Journal of English Education, 5(1), 49-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.31327/jee.v5i1.1209

Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (2009). Assessment Framework Key Competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Retrieved 20 October 2022 from https:// www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf

Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of learning disabilities, 48(4), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413504995

Schalich, M. E. (2015). Analysis of Pre Test and Post Test Performance of Students in a Learning Center Model at the Elementary School Level. Graduate Master's Theses, Capstones, and Culminating Projects. 181. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2015.edu.08

Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2010). A theory of learning for the mobile age: Learning through conversation and exploration across contexts. Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen: die deutschprachige und britische Diskussion, 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92133-4_6

Ulu, M. (2017). The Effect of Reading Comprehension and Problem Solving Strategies on Classifying Elementary 4th Grade Students with High and Low Problem Solving Success. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(6), 44-63. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141427

Vacca, J. R.T.(2015).Reading and Learning to Read (9th ed.). Pearson.
World Vision. (2022). Brigada Pagbasa (National Reading Brigade). Retrieved from 10 December 2022 https://www.wvi.org/stories/brigada-pagbasa-programme-national-reading-brigade

Downloads

Published

2024-06-20