RELABELING BY INFLUENCERS IN THE DIGITAL MARKETPLACE

A Legal Analysis Under Indonesian Law, Islamic Commercial Ethics, and FTC Regulations

Authors

  • Shofa Robbani Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri University
  • Dinda Oktavia Bulan Fitriani Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri University
  • Muhammad Nazir Alias National University of Malaysia image/svg+xml
  • Dwi Nur Laili Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri University
  • M. Iqbal Maulana Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri University
  • Yuni Salma Nur Afida Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri University
  • Amaliatus Sholihah Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/muamalah.ebst5p68

Keywords:

Relabeling, Consumer Protection Law, Influencer Marketing, TikTok Shop

Abstract

This research is a normative legal study using a case study approach that analyzes the legal and ethical implications of relabeling practices conducted by influencers in Indonesia. The problem arises from the case of Shella Saukia and Umama Scarf, in which original hijab products were resold after their brand labels were replaced with a private “SS” label without authorization. This practice poses serious legal concerns regarding consumer deception, violation of trademark rights, and unfair business competition in digital commerce. The study relies entirely on secondary data through library research, using primary legal materials such as Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, Law Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 73 of 2015 on Mandatory Labeling on Goods. The analysis applies a normative qualitative method by correlating Indonesian positive law with principles of fiqh muamalah—particularly ṣidq (honesty), bayān (transparency), and ‘adālah (justice). The findings show that unauthorized relabeling violates consumers’ rights to accurate information, infringes trademark protection, and distorts fair market competition. From an Islamic legal perspective, such practices constitute tadlīs (deception), gharar (uncertainty), and ghasb (unlawful appropriation), all of which are categorically prohibited. As a comparative framework, this study also refers to the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations, which strictly mandate truth-in-labeling and prohibit deceptive or unfair marketing practices. These standards provide valuable insight for strengthening Indonesia’s regulatory safeguards. The study concludes that harmonizing positive law, Islamic legal principles, and international best practices is essential to ensuring a fair, transparent, and ethical digital trade ecosystem.

 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Dinda Oktavia Bulan Fitriani, Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri University

     

     

References

Admin. “15 U.S. Code § 45 - Unfair methods of competition unlawful; prevention by Commission | U.S. Code | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute.” 2025. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/45.

Admin. “Hukum Copyright Dalam Islam dan Dalilnya.” DalamIslam.com, 2025. https://dalamislam.com/hukum-islam/hukum-copyright-dalam-islam.

Admin. “Resolution on Intellectual Property Rights.” Islamic Fiqh Academy, Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), 2025.

Admin. “The Digital Economy Landscape in Indonesia – AASYP.” Diakses 6 Juni 2025. https://aasyp.org/2023/06/10/the-digital-economy-landscape-in-indonesia/.

Anestia, Corry. “Data Tren Pemasaran ‘Influencer’ di Indonesia.” Februari 2024. https://cms.dailysocial.id/post/menyimak-data-tren-pemasaran-influencer-di-indonesia/.

April. “Dicap Curang Tutupi Brand Umama Scraf, Ini Kata Shella Saukia - Ntvnews.id.” Januari 2025. https://www.ntvnews.id/hiburan/0132843/dicap-curang-tutupi-brand-umama-scraf-ini-kata-shella-saukia.

Edy, Sarwo. “Hukum Islam dan Akhlaq sebagai Pilar Utama dalam Manajemen Bisnis Islami.” Dalam Jurnal Muamalah dan Ekonomi Syari’ah, vol. 5. no. 2. 2023.

Hidayatullah, Aidil Arlana, Muinah Fadhilah, Lusia Tria, dan Hatmanti Hutami. “The Influence of Influencer Marketing and Social Media Marketing on Purchase Decisions with Brand Awareness as an Intervening Variable for TikTok Shop in Generation Z.” Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting 5, no. 6 (2025): 5678–92. https://doi.org/10.38035/DIJEFA.V5I6.3667.

Krisnadwipayan, Universitas, dan Jl Raya Jatiwaringin. “TINDAK PIDANA TIDAK MENGGUNAKAN LABEL BERBAHASA INDONESIA PADA BARANG YANG DIPERDAGANGKAN DI DALAM NEGERI OLEH PELAKU USAHA.” Dalam THE JURIS, VIII. no. 1. 2024.

Latifiani, Dian, Alya Fatimah Azzahra, Oktora Tri Wanida, dkk. PENTINGNYA HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL SEBAGAI HAK BENDA BAGI HAK CIPTA ATAU MERK PERUSAHAAN. Vol. 31. no. 1. 2022.

Law Number 8 of 1999 regulates Costumers Protection.

Law Number 20 of 2016 regulates Marks and Geographical Indications.

Losung, Angelita Dumawati, Max Sepang, dan Adi Tirto Koesoemo. KAJIAN HUKUM TENTANG PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG HAK CIPTA 1 Oleh. IX. no. 9. 2021.

mulyadi, Tirta, Ansir Launtu, Muh. Abduh. Anwar, Agus Suyatno, dan Imam Jayanto. “Analisis Efektivitas Kampanye Influencer Marketing: Tinjauan Terhadap Pengaruh dan Persepsi Konsumen Terhadap Merek.” Jurnal Darma Agung 32, no. 2 (2024): 872–83. https://doi.org/10.46930/OJSUDA.V32I2.4169.

Nuryanti, Amelia Putri. “Diduga Jual Hijab Hasil Tempel Brand Umama Scarf, Pihak Umama Scarf Bantah Kerja Sama dengan Shella Saukia - Sumsel 24.” Sumsel24.com, Januari 2025. https://www.sumsel24.com/public-figure/32814386774/diduga-jual-hijab-hasil-tempel-brand-umama-scarf-pihak-umama-scarf-bantah-kerja-sama-dengan-shella-saukia.

Permata Liegestu, Yenny, dan Asmin Patros. “PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEREK DI INDONESIA: STUDI PUTUSAN.” Dalam Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus |, vol. 7. no. 2. 2022.

Rahayu, Sri Ulfa. “MANHAJ IMAM AN-NAWAWI DALAM KITAB SYARAH HADIS SAHIH MUSLIM.” Al-I’jaz: Jurnal Kewahyuan Islam 6, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.30821/AL-I.

Rahmawati, Yasinta. “Klarifikasi Shella Saukia yang Ketahuan Tutupi Logo Hijab Umama untuk Brand-nya: Waktu Awal Merintis...” suara.com, Januari 2025. https://www.suara.com/lifestyle/2025/01/23/135212/klarifikasi-shella-saukia-yang-ketahuan-tutupi-logo-hijab-umama-untuk-brand-nya-waktu-awal-merintis.

Sa’adah, Salsabila Nur, Rohmi Alfiyah, Nur Hidayah, dkk. “Pengaruh Komunikasi Persuasif Influencer Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian di TikTok Shop.” Investama : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis 9, no. 2 (2023): 209–20. https://doi.org/10.56997/INVESTAMAJURNALEKONOMIDANBISNIS.V9I2.919.

Velasquez, Manuel G. “Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases.” Juni 2021. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/business-ethics-concepts-and-cases/P200000003111/9780137540969.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Robbani, S., Fitriani, D. O. B., Alias, M. N., Laili, D. N., Maulana, M. I., & Sholihah, A. (2025). RELABELING BY INFLUENCERS IN THE DIGITAL MARKETPLACE: A Legal Analysis Under Indonesian Law, Islamic Commercial Ethics, and FTC Regulations (Y. S. N. Afida, Trans.). Mu’amalah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 4(2), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.32332/muamalah.ebst5p68