Student’s Cognitive Engagement in Teaching Vocabulary through Mnemonic Strategy

Authors

  • Agung Gumelar Setiawan Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Putri Kamalia Hakim Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v11i2.7658

Keywords:

Cognitive Engagement, Vocabulary, Mnemonic Strategy, Total Partcipation Technique

Abstract

This research aims to explore students' cognitive engagement and find out student’s perception towards learning vocabulary through mnemonic strategy. This research is a qualitative research with TPT cognitive engagement model as research design. The data of this research was gathered for four meetings by using observation, interview, and documentation. The data of observation were analyzed by interactive analysis supported by quadrant and tally analysis. The researcher take five participants from 10th grades from one of Islamic senior high school MAN 2 Kuningan. The findings showed that students have positive cognitive engagement where all of the participants get in the 4th quadrant except for one. Students Cognition level improved throughout the time until they have high cognition and high participation. Students also showed positive perceptions where they feel happy and fun during learning because they considered mnemonic strategy is like a game. Students also stated that their thinking skill is improved by the learning. Mnemonic strategy is also suggested to be implemented as a method in learning vocabulary in schools because it is effective.

References

Amiruddin, G. (2011). Comprehensive review of mnemonic devices and their applications.

Amiryousefi, M., & Ketabi, S. (2011). Mnemonic Instruction: A Way to Boost Vocabulary Learning and Recall. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.1.178-182

Bransford, J, D. (1979). Human Cognition: Learning, Understanding, & Remembering. Belmont CA.

Firmanto, B. (2007). Pendidikan Indonesia. Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id.

Hayes, O. C. (2009). The Use of Melodic and Rhythmic Mnemonics.

Himelle, & Himelle, second. (2017). Total participation technique.

Juhana. (2018). Psychological factors that hinder students from speaking in English class (A case study in a senior high school in South Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia). Journal of Education and Practice.

Katherine, Renjifo, Paiva, & Rocio. (2022). Design a practical guide for the proper use of pegword for a better vocabulary acquisition.

Kridis, O. B. (2023). The Chaining Method for Better Vocabulary Retention: Tunisian University Students as a Case Study.

Marthila, L. (2020). The Effectiveness of using mnemonic technique in teaching vocabulary mastery at the first semester of the seventh grade of smpn 2 baradatu in the academic year of 2019/2020. Repository.Radenintan.Ac.Id.

Mete, F., Ali̇Başi̇Ç, B., & Köksal, B. (2023). Impact of Vocabulary Teaching Approach in Turkish Curriculum on Turkish Textbooks and Use of Technology in Vocabulary Teaching. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 8(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1179069

Miles, M., B., & Huberman, A., M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Narwanti, S. (2011). Pendidikan Karakter pengintegrasian 18 Nilai Pembentuk Karakter dalam Mata Pelajaran. Familia.

Putri. (2020). The effectiveness of using menmonic strategy to improve students’ vocabulary at eight grade of smp negeri 33 bulukamba (pre-experimintal research).

Rohmatillah. (2018). A study on students’ difficulties in learning vocabulary.

Sari, Zailani, Aureli, R., & Dhian. (2020). The effectiveness of menmonic strategy to teach vocabulary viewed from students’ creativity. Vol. 2No. 1 Juni2020.

Taylor, Pearson, Peterson, & Rodriguez. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal.

Thảo, T. M. (2022). The application of mnemonic strategies to improve efl students’ aptitude for vocabulary. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 7(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp166-183

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28