Measuring EFL Students' Digital Literacy in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v11i1.6523Keywords:
EFL students, digital literacy, industrial revolution era 4.0, literacy, technology literacyAbstract
This study is designed to explore the level of EFL students’ digital literacy in using technologies to support their learning activities. The researcher employed a survey method in gaining the perspectives of one hundred and seven students from the English education department in one of the Islamic universities in Bengkulu. The researcher distributed the survey of digital literacy scale to be filled out by the respondents to get the data. The results were analyzed quantitatively using simple descriptive statistics by calculating the average value of all answers from thirty-six question items. The findings revealed that the students’ digital literacy level was a good category, with an average score of 3.01. Moreover, the students were considered to have a good level of digital literacy overall. On the contrary, they still had low improvement, particularly in areas namely, critical thinking, connectedness, and creativity. Therefore, teachers ought to pay more attention to such issues because they are crucial, particularly for students to achieve the main components of the 4Cs (critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication) in 21st-century learning.
References
Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106. http://www.editlib.org/p/4793/%5Cnfiles/364/Eshet and
Eshet - 2004 - Digital Literacy A Conceptual Framework for Survi.pdf%5Cnfiles/459/4793.html
APJI. (2022). Hasil Survey Profil Internet Indonesia 2022. Apji.or.Od, June. apji.or.id
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth). Pearson Education, Inc.
Forutanian, S. (2021). Exploring the Components of Digital literacy Curriculum: EFL and IT Instructors’ Voice. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.1.4
Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). Generation Z McKinsey. McKinsey & Company, 10. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Consumer Packaged Goods/Our Insights/True Gen Generation Z and its implications for companies/Generation-Z-and-its-implication-for-companies.ashx
IMD World Competitiveness Centre Team. (2021). IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2021. IMD World Competitiveness Center, 96–97. https://www.imd.org/globalassets/wcc/docs/release-
2017/world_digital_competitiveness_yearbook_2017.pdf
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press.
Law, N., Woo, D., de la Torre, J., & Wong, G. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy. UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 51, 146.
Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit – a European Framework for Digital Literacy: a Progress Report. Journal of ELiteracy, 2.
Mudra, H. (2020). Digital Literacy Among Young Learners: How Do Efl Teachers and Learners View Its Benefits and Barriers? Teaching English with Technology, 20(3), 3–24.
Reza, J., Aprianti, F., & Sugesti, I. (2023). An Analysis of EFL Students ’ Digital Literacy Competence. 2(1), 268–274.
Rinekso, A. B., Rodliyah, R. S., & Pertiwi, I. (2021). Digital literacy practices in tertiary education: A case of efl postgraduate students. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.18863
Rizqiana, N. U. (2021). “New Literacies” As University Students’Essential Skills for Self-Regulated Digital Learning. ISCE: Journal of Innovative Studies on Character and …, 5(2), 286–292. http://iscjournal.com/index.php/isce/article/view/126%0Ahttps://iscjournal.com/index.php/isce/article/download/126/117
Vorobel, O., Voorhees, T. T., & Gokcora, D. (2021). Language learners’ digital literacies: Focus on students’ information literacy and reading practices online. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1127–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12550
Yu, Z. (2022). Sustaining Student Roles, Digital Literacy, Learning Achievements, and Motivation in Online Learning Environments during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084388
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). Chapter 6: New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791"