A TEXT ANALYSIS ON PRESIDENT JOKO WIDODO’S SPEECH AT APEC CEO SUMMIT ASIAN PACIFIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v6i1.1113Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), Van Dijk’s design, textAbstract
According to Van Dijk, there are three dimensions of discourse analysis, namely text, social cognition and social context. This study was focused on the first dimension, text. Joko Widodo’s first presidential English speech on economic issues in front of international audience in CEO Summit in Beijing was one of speeches a lot of people talk about. Some like while some others dislike. This study was intended to analyze the transcript of the speech. This text analysis was based on Van Dijk’s design in which the unit elements of the analysis are divided into three parts: macro-structure, suprastructure and microstructure. The result of the analysis revealed that in macrostructure element, several sentences in the presidential speech were less coherent in term of stating theme. Then, in suprastructure, the scheme of the speech consisted of opening, content and closing. Finally, in the microstrucure, the semantic aspect could be found in setting, detail, intention, presupposition, and normalization.
References
Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and Political Discourse: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Erdogan’s Political Speech. ARECLS, 7(1), 18.
Deocampo, M. F. (2015). The New English Teacher. The New English Teacher, 9(1), 38–62.
Eriyanto. (2009). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: Lkis.
Esfehani, L. S. (2013). From Macro and Microstructures to an Innovation: The Macrofiction Structure. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 1(2), 18.
Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction (p. 357). London: Sage Publication.
Gowhary, H., Rahimi, F., Azizifar, A., & Jamalinesari, A. (2015). A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Electoral Talks of Iranian Presidential Candidates in 2013. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.020
Kone, A. M. (2016). Metaphor in Ir. Soekarno’sSpeech. Researchers World : Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce, 7(4), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.18843/rwjasc/v7i4(1)/18
Madkur, A. (2013). Grammatical Analysis on the Abstract of Scientific Writing. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 52–67.
Madkur, A. (2014). Pragmatics in EFL Instruction: Speech Acts in English Speaking Class (Vol. 1, p. 7). Presented at the Siliwangi International English Conference (SIEC), Tasikmalaya: Siliwangi University.
Priatmoko, F. X. N. A., & Cahyono, S. P. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s Speech. Dian Nuswantoro University Semarang, 14.
Rachman, A., & Yunianti, S. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis in Donald Trump Presidential Campaign to Win American’s Heart. TELL Journal, 5(2), 8–17.
Saadabad, M. H., & Kasmani, M. B. (2014). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Summit Series: There presentation of Social Actors. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 3(2), 61–71.
Saputro, E. P. N. (2015). The Analysis of Illocutionary Acts of Jokowi’s Speeches (Master Thesis). Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta.
Van Dick, T. A. (1995). Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis. In Language and Peace (pp. 17–33). Aldershot: Darmouth Publishing.
Van Dick, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity. In Methods of Criticaal Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publication. Retrieved from http://www.discourse.org
Wang, J. (2010). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama’s Speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261
Wang, Y., & Guo, M. (2014). A Short Analysis of Discourse Coherence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465
