ACCREDITATION-BASED QUALITY BUILDING RECONSTRUCTION TOWARDS EXCELLENT PTKI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/akademika.v27i1.4883Keywords:
Accreditation, Institutional Management, PTKI QualityAbstract
The main problem and spectrum that is always faced by Indonesian Islamic Higher Education (PTKI) is the low and not optimal quality of the three missions of higher education, namely education, research, and service. Various problems related to this are increasingly visible from the fact that the system's alignment, and policies to the institutional leadership structure seem to leave quality as an agenda, and programs are not prioritized. Therefore, the aspects and functions of quality management at PTKI are important. Improvement in Quality Management in PTKI should be oriented to build a quality culture in all components and elements of the academic community The most urgent quality culture for PTKI that must be done in meeting quality standards is to strengthen the system and meet the accreditation standards that have been required to achieve maximum results. In the context of accreditation, building quality must also strengthen the position in the sector of coordination, synchronization, and supervision between the entire academic community. The most urgent quality culture for PTKI that must be done in meeting quality standards is to strengthen the system and meet the accreditation standards that have been required to achieve maximum results. The transformation of seven criteria into 9 criteria in the accreditation system has consequences and consistency in the assessment aspect that leads to the outcomes (achievements of the process and usefulness) that have been passed by PTKI with various implementations based on its quality standards/guidelines. This research uses qualitative methods that are descriptive-analytical and seeks to analyze how the supporting factors of quality culture exist PTKI. This study uses a qualitative method that is descriptive-analytical and seeks to analyze how the factors supporting the quality culture in PTKI.
Downloads
References
Asyraf, H. H. B. & S. A. (1989). Konsep Universitas Islam. PT. Tiara Wacana.
Gunawan. (2017). Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan Perguruan Tinggi Islam Swasta (Studi Kasus Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam dalam Meningkatkan Input dan Output UM Metro, IAIM NU dan STIT Agus Salim Metro) (Issue December). UIN RIL.
Mahmud. (2019). Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi berbasis Nilai-niai Spiritualitas. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. www.rosda.co.id
Mujtahid, M. (2016). Membangun pendidikan tinggi Islam berbasis mutu. 19(November), 25. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/1746/
Mulyana, D. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosda Karya.
National Accreditation Board for Higher Education. (2019). Guidelines for Preparing Iapt 3.0 Higher Education Performance Reports.
O’Brien, dalam S. B. (2010). Substansi Akreditasi pada sebuah Institusi Pendidikan.
National Higher Education Standard number 3 of 2020.
About Guidelines for Preparing Self-Evaluation Report Number 59 of 2018.
Sallis, E. (2006). Total Quality Management in Education. Ircisod.
Tim Direktorat Diktis. (2022). Grand Design Pendidikan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam 2020-2045. Direktorat Pendidikan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama RI.