Interrelated Complexities in The Arabic Structural Reposition
Layers of Deviation, Relation, and Implication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/ijalt.v5i02.7440Keywords:
Deviation, Interrelated Complexities, Structural RepositionAbstract
Abstract: This article mainly discusses the case of structural reposition in the Arabic language and the interrelated complexities occur within the case. Technically, the case of structural reposition, to some extent, is closely similar to the terms of at-taqdīm wa at-ta’khīr in Arabic linguistic tradition. Several studies as well as researches concerning this issue have been done, mainly to describe structural elements of this case. There are mainly three elements that this article focusses on: linguistic style (deviation), linguistic structure (relation), and the implied meaning (implication). The result of this article shows that there are at least three linguistic elements (style, structure, and meaning) occur within the case of structural reposition. Those three elements have a close interrelated function that operate simultaneously (mutazāmin wa mutaẓāfir) in each linguistic unit within the case. In this sense, the structural reposition of linguistic units represents deviation, while the connection occurs between the existing units represents relation, whereas both deviation and relation can provide direct implication in producing certain meaning
References
Amnuai, Wirada, Pansupa Kotuta, and Maythinee Duangprasertchai, ‘Textual and Linguistic Characteristics of Research Article Abstracts’, LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 23.1 (2020), 168–81 <https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v23i1.2407>
Amrulloh, Muhammad Afif, Munirul Ikhwan, Universitas Islam, Negeri Raden, Intan Lampung, Kota Bandar Lampung, and others, ‘STYLISTIC OF THE QUR ’ AN’, Arabiyât, 8.1 (2021), 17–31
Dilnoza, Fayzullayeva Ubaydulloyevna, ‘LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE WORD’, European Journal of Humanities and Educational Advancements (EJHEA), 3.1 (2022), 66–68
Döring, Anna Lisa, Rasha Abdel Rahman, Pienie Zwitserlood, and Antje Lorenz, ‘Cumulative Semantic Interference Is Blind to Morphological Complexity and Originates at the Conceptual Level’, PLoS ONE, 17.6 June (2022), 1–27 <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268915>
Hans Wehr, A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (New York: Spoken Language Services, Inc, 1976)
Hasnah, Yetti, ‘Al-Rabṭ Dalam Tinjauan Struktur Dan Makna’, Jurnal Alfaz, 3.1 (2015), 107–29
Johandi, Mohamad Lalu, ‘SYNTAGMATIC RELATIONSHIP OF THE INFINITIVE IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE SENTENCE’, International Journal of World Languages, 2.1 (2022), 1–7
Khitam, Achmad Khusnul, ‘At-TaTanāwub, At-TaTaqdīm WaWa At-TaTa’khīr, Dan Al-Iltifāt (Kajian Stilistika Al-Qur’an Dan Puisi Arab)’, Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2.1 (2017), 1–18
Latif, Abdul, Muhammad Afif Amrulloh, Hanik Mahliatussikah, Intan Muflihah, and Yeni Lailatul Wahidah, ‘Al-Asrâr Fî Tikrâr Hiwâr Al-Nabi Musa Wa Al-‘Abd Fî Sûrah Al-Kahfi: Tahlîl Al-Îjâz Wa Al-Ithnâb’, Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 2022 <https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v9i2.28892>
Mahsun, Metode Penelitian Bahasa (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2007)
Mansoor, Mohammad S., and Yusra M. Salman, ‘Linguistic Deviation in Literary Style’, Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4.1 (2020), 7–16 <https://doi.org/10.24086/cuejhss.v4n1y2020.pp7-16>
Milah, Aang Saeful, ‘Al-Kalimah Fi Al-‘Arabiyyah ‘Inda an-Nuḥāt Al-Mutaqaddimin Wa Al-Muta’Akhirin Wa Al-Mu’Āṣirīn’, Alfaz (Arabic Literatures for Academic Zealots), 7.1 (2019), 17–28 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32678/alfaz.Vol7.Iss01.1934>
Namaziandost, Ehsan, Fariba Rahimi Esfahani, and Akbar Khajehpour, ‘The Effect of Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Relationships on Learning Grammar Among Iranian Pre-Intermediate Efl Learners’, International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies, 2.3 (2018), 391–407 <https://doi.org/10.30575/2017/ijlres-2018091208>
Nurdianto, Talqis, ‘CONCEPT OF TAQDIM AND TAKHIR BETWEEN ’ABD AL-QAHIR AL-JURJANI AND AL-SAKKAKI’, Ulum Islamiyyah Journal, 2017, 163–77
———, ‘Zawahir Al-Taqdim Wa Al-Ta’Khir Fi Surah Al-Fatihah: Dirasah Balagiyyah’, Indonesian Journal of Islamic Literature and Muslim Society, 2.2 (2018), 235–58 <https://doi.org/10.22515/islimus.v2i2.1011>
Nurdiyanto, Talqis, ‘Daur Uslub At-Taqdim Wa at-Ta’khir Fi Tahsin Al-Lughah Al-Arabiyyah’, Cmes, VIII (2015), 57–69 <https://doi.org/10.20961/cmes.8.1.11616>
Panahy, Salman, ‘Semantic Information and the Complexity of Deduction’, Erkenntnis, 2023 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-023-00690-7>
Rahman, Dudung Abdur, Pengantar Metode Penelitian (Yogyakarta: Kurnia Alam Semesta, 2003)
Rahman, Lawal, and Khalil Mohammed Usman Gbodofu, ‘Stylistic Features of Yunus Abdullahi’s “Yalaimi’s” Arabic Praise Poems to Prophet Mohammed’, International Journal of Arabic Language Teaching, 3.02 (2021), 149 <https://doi.org/10.32332/ijalt.v3i02.3695>
Sahiruddin, Sahiruddin, ‘Textual Syntactic Complexity and Its Role In Second Language Reading Outcomes In Indonesia’, 6.2 (2019), 165–87 <https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v6i2.1268>
Saifuddin, A H, ‘Integrasi Linguistik Dan Kajian Keagamaan: Peran Kajian Bahasa Dalam Kajian Keislaman’, 22.1 (2022), 1–11 <https://doi.org/10.47732/alfalahjikk.v22i1.177>
Salaudeen, Abdulwahab Ajao, ‘Semantic Aspect of Arabic Morphology: Ideas and Theories’, Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning, 2.1 (2019), 18–26 <https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v2i1.5634>
Seiler, Hansjakob, ‘On Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Similarity’, Lingua, 18.C (2023), 35–79 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(67)90019-8>
Susiawati, Wati, ‘Kajian Bahasa Arab Dari A Historis Hingga Historis’, Alfaz (Arabic Literatures for Academic Zealots), 7.01 (2019), 43 <https://doi.org/10.32678/alfaz.vol7.iss01.1925>
Triana, Rumba, ‘Internalisisi Jihad Dalam Pendidikan Karater’, Edukasi Islami : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7.01 (2018), 101 <https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v7i01.208>