Telaah Nilai Kepastian dan Keadilan pada Regulasi Mahar dalam Pembangunan Hukum Keluarga

Authors

  • Elfa Murdiana Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro, Indonesia
  • Siti Zulaikha Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro, Indonesia
  • Nurul Mahmudah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/tapis.v5i1.3367

Keywords:

Mahar, Hukum Perkawinan, Ius Constituendum, Marriage Law, Dowry

Abstract

Explicitly, a dowry is not found in the legal protection of marriage, but normatively it is read firmly in Chapter V articles 30 to 38 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. In Article 2 Paragraph 1 of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage states that "Marriage is legal, if it is carried out according to the laws of each religion and belief". The explanation of the article emphasizes that there is no marriage if it is not carried out according to religion and belief in accordance with the 1945 Constitution, in which a marriage will be declared valid if a dowry has been paid in it.

This study will describe the dynamics of dowry in the meaning of religion and culture associated with several regulations carried out through a policy and cultural approach. The data collection techniques used were interviews and an inventory of policies on marriage and dowry which were described inductively to find the dowry formulation as part of the Ius Constituendum on Marriage Law in Indonesia.

The indecisiveness of the Marriage Law as a Formal Gezet in the implementation of marriage is indicated as a factor causing the various meanings and implementation of the dowry, like the pillars and conditions of marriage. So that the essence of the dowry as the actualization of the role of women to express their rights in marriage is still injured because the dowry is actualized as a bargaining transaction between the two families of the groom and the bride. So that the high dowry actually makes women the object of transactions that reduce their rights in the implementation of marriage. Efforts to change the legal umbrella of marriage in Indonesia should be carried out for the sake of certainty and justice of marriage law for all Indonesian people, especially in the concept of dowry payments so that it can be used as the basis for the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia. It is hoped that the dowry regulation can be clearly broken down in creating legal certainty and justice.

References

Abdulkadir, M. (2004). Hukum dan Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Aini, N. (2016). Tradisi Mahar di Ranah Lokalitas Umat Islam: Mahar dan Struktur Sosial di Masyarakat Muslim Indonesia. Jurnal Ahkam 14(1), 14.
Al-Syafi’I, M.I. (2002). Al-Umm. Jilid V. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr.
Anjelina, L. (2019). Mahar Perkawinan Adat Suku Buton Perspektif Teori Hudud Muhammad Shahrur (Studi Kasus di Desa Bahari, Kecamatan Sampolawa, Kabupaten Buton Selatan). SAKINA: Journal of Family Studies 3(1), 11.
Apriyanti. (2017). Historiografi Mahar dalam Pernikahan. An-Nisa’a 12(2), 171.
Assidiqie, J. (2006). Perihal Undang-Undang. Jakarta: Konstitusi Pers.
Damis, H. (2016). Konsep Mahar dalam Perspektif Fikih dan Perundang-Undangan Kajian Putusan Nomor 23 K/AG/2012 Divergensi Tafsir. Jurnal Yudisial 9(1), 19.
Halimah. B. (2017). Konsep Mahar (Maskawin) dalam Tafsir Kontemporer. Al-Daulah 6(2), 310.
Hasma. (2019). Hukum Mahar berupa Tanah dalam Kebiasaan Masyarakat Bugis Bone menurut Perundang-Undangan, Al-Syakhshiyyah. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam dan Kemanusiaan 1(1), 22.
Helmy, M. (2016). Kedudukan Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islammenurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Madzahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 15(1), 139-150.
Izzuddin, A. (2019). Menakar Mahar: Studi tentang Masyarakat Santri di Desa Karangbesuki 42 Sukun, Kota Malang Menakar Mahar: Studi tentang Masyarakat Santri di Desa Karangbesuki Sukun, Kota Malang. Sabda 14(1), 44.
Kafi, A. (2020). Mahar Pernikahan Dalam Pandangan Hukum Dan Pendidikan. Transformative Islamic Education Journal, 3(1), 55.
Malik, I. (1992). Muwaththa’ al -Imam Malik, terj.Adib Hasan Bisri Mustofa juz II. Semarang: Asy-Syifa.
Marwan, A. (2019). Keberadaan Instruksi Presiden sebagai Produk Hukum Di Indonesia. Reformasi Hukum 23(1), 110.
Moleong, L.J. (2012). Metode penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Mughniyah, M.J. (2001). Fiqih Lima Mazhab, Terj. Afif Muhammad. Jakarta: PT. Lentera Basritama.
Nasution, K. (2012). Islam tentang Relasi Suami dan Isteri (Hukum Perkawinan 1). Yogyakarta: ACAdeMIA Tazzafa.
Nuruddin, A., Tarigan, A. A. (2004). Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.
Rahmat, J. (2002). Metode Penelitian Dilengkapi Contoh Analisis Statistik. Cet. 11. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sunggono, B. (2002). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tanya, B. (2010). Teori Hukum (StrategiTertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi). Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Winario, M. (2020). Esesnsi dan Standart Mahar Menurut Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Jurnal Al-Himayah 4(1), 72.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30