Implementasi Kebijakan Pelestarian Cagar Budaya pada Rumah Sejarah Dokterswoning Kota Metro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/tapis.v10i2.14466Keywords:
cultural heritage preservation, policy implementation, local history education, Dokterswoning Historical HouseAbstract
Cultural heritage preservation is an essential aspect of public policy aimed at protecting historical assets, strengthening cultural identity, and supporting sustainable development. The effectiveness of heritage preservation depends on several policy implementation factors, namely communication, resources, implementers' disposition, and bureaucratic structure, as proposed by Edward III (1980). This study aims to analyze the implementation of cultural heritage preservation policy by the Department of Education and Culture of Metro City through a case study of the Dokterswoning Historical House. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation involving purposively selected informants. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, which consists of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The trustworthiness of the findings was established through source, technique, and time triangulation. The findings reveal that the implementation of the cultural heritage preservation policy has been relatively effective, particularly in terms of communication through public outreach, inter-agency coordination, and the utilization of the Dokterswoning Historical House as a medium for local history education. However, the implementation has yet to achieve optimal outcomes due to limitations in human resources, budget allocation, and supporting facilities. The implementers demonstrated a strong commitment to preserving cultural heritage, while the bureaucratic structure facilitated coordination despite several institutional constraints. The study concludes that strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing collaboration among government agencies, academics, historical communities, and the wider community, and ensuring sustainable financial support are essential strategies for improving the effectiveness of cultural heritage preservation policy implementation in Metro City.
References
Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Rev. ed.). Rineka Cipta.
Ashworth, G. J., & Tunbridge, J. E. (1996). Dissonant heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
Cantika, D. P., & Kurniawan, B. (2022). Implementasi kebijakan pelestarian cagar budaya (Studi: Eksistensi Museum Sepuluh Nopember di Kota Surabaya). Publika, 10(4), 1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v10n4.p1227-1242
Dewi, A. S., Setianingsih, E. L., & Yuniningsih, T. (2023). Implementasi kebijakan pelestarian bangunan cagar budaya Kota Lama Semarang. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 12(4), 733–744. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jppmr/article/view/41467
Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
Feilden, B. M., & Jokilehto, J. (1998). Management guidelines for world cultural heritage sites. ICCROM.
ICOMOS. (2008). The ICOMOS charter for the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage sites. International Council on Monuments and Sites.
Kartodirdjo, S. (1993). Pendekatan ilmu sosial dalam metodologi sejarah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar ilmu antropologi. Rineka Cipta.
Lipe, W. D. (1984). Value and meaning in cultural resources. In H. Cleere (Ed.), Approaches to the archaeological heritage (pp. 1–11). Cambridge University Press.
Mason, R. (2002). Assessing values in conservation planning: Methodological issues and choices. Getty Conservation Institute.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ndraha, T. (2003). Kybernology (Ilmu pemerintahan baru). Rineka Cipta.
Patton, M. Q., & Assyakurrohin, D., et al. (2023). Pendekatan studi kasus dalam penelitian kualitatif. Penerbit Akademik.
Sidharta. (2010). Konservasi bangunan dan lingkungan bersejarah. Penerbit Arsitektur.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2000). Paradigma baru pendidikan nasional. Rineka Cipta.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya. (2010).
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (2013). Managing cultural world heritage. UNESCO.
Zein, A. B. (2011). Pelestarian cagar budaya dan pengembangan pariwisata berkelanjutan. Pustaka Budaya.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mirnawati, Wahyu Widodo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
