Transparansi Pengelolaan Dana Desa oleh Aparatur Desa dalam Perspektif Good Governance

Studi pada Desa Sidodadi, Kecamatan Lampung Timur

Authors

  • Navid Fajriant Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung, Indonesia
  • Jidan Nuramadan Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung, Indonesia
  • Choirul Salim, M.H. Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung, Indonesia
  • Icha Oktafia Khaerani Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/tapis.v9i2.11328

Keywords:

Good Governance, village fund, transparency, village aparatus

Abstract

This qualitative case study analyzes the practices and factors that influence the transparency of the management of the Sidodadi Village Fund. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and analysis of budget documents (APBDes, RKPDes, LPJDes, LRA). The results show that transparency is implemented through formal mechanisms such as village meetings and bulletin boards, as well as informal channels such as social gatherings of village officials and communication at the sub-district level to reach hamlets. The findings identify factors that hinder effectiveness, namely regulatory restrictions on cost details, limitations in technology and human resources of the village apparatus, and variations in the information literacy of the community. This study concludes that although an information disclosure framework exists, residents’ substantive understanding of budget allocation remains limited. The empirical contribution of this research is the mapping of the role of informal channels in supporting transparency when digital means are not yet optimal, as well as the identification of regulatory restrictions that limit the depth of budget information disclosed. Furthermore, this study describes the interaction between formal procedures and social communication networks that shape access to information in rural environments. These findings form the basis for the development of adaptive and inclusive transparency strategies for rural contexts with varying levels of technological capacity and public literacy.

References

Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. SAGE Publications.

Andayani, S., Zitri, I., & Darmansyah, D. (2024). Pengaruh akuntabilitas dan transparansi dana desa terhadap tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat di Kelurahan Punia Mataram. Journal of Law and Government, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31764/jlag.v2i1.15873

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025, February 26). Jumlah desa/kelurahan menurut provinsi, 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/3/YkVWWFUyNTJTVTloVGpCeFdFVTNaMk5wUzFaUFFUMDkjMw==/jumlah-desa-sup-1--sup--kelurahan-menurut-provinsi--2024.html?year=2024

Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 22(9), 1253–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90003-5

Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (Eds.). (2007). Decentralizing governance: Emerging concepts and practices. Brookings Institution Press.

Dwiyanto, A. (2014). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. UGM Press.

Filgueiras, F. (2016). Transparency and accountability: Principles and rules for the construction of publicity. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(2), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1575

Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso.

Gafar, T. F., Suryaningsih, S., Zamhasari, Z., & Krisnawansyah, Y. (2023). Pengelolaan keuangan desa: Menilik peran perangkat desa dalam Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 20 Tahun 2018. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara, 1(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i3.501

Herlina Manurung, H., Oktaviani, A. P., Lestari, D., Sukainah, S., & Firdatama, A. A. (2023). Peran Badan Permusyawaratan Desa (BPD) sebagai pengawas internal pengelolaan dana desa. Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 1(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.62017/wanargi.v1i2.182

Kampung Keluarga Berkualitas. (2017). Profil Desa Sidodadi. Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. https://kampungkb.bkkbn.go.id/kampung/2177/sidodadi

Larisu, Z., & Jopang, J. (2022). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam mendukung optimalisasi perencanaan dan penganggaran pembangunan desa di Kabupaten Muna. Sebatik, 26(2), 622–629. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v26i2.2050

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Maulana, M. (2023). Risiko korupsi pengelolaan anggaran desa. ARMADA: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 1(3), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v1i3.435

Mardikanto, T. (2012). Pemberdayaan masyarakat dalam perspektif kebijakan publik. Alfabeta.

Masruroh, S. L., Nasrizal, N., & Hanif, R. A. (2024). Pengaruh akuntabilitas, transparansi, partisipasi masyarakat, dan kompetensi aparatur desa terhadap pengelolaan dana desa di Kabupaten Karimun. Journal of Tax and Business, 5(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.55336/jpb.v5i1.114

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Murapi, I., & Astarini, D. A. O. (2025). Pengaruh akuntabilitas dan transparansi terhadap pengelolaan dana desa dengan pendekatan deskriptif asosiatif. Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 9(2), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisamar.v9i2.1851

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). Promise and problems of e-democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Open government: The global context and the way forward. OECD Publishing.

Pangestu, E. I., Yusman, M., & Sagala, M. K. (2022). Designing a village government website as a media for disseminating information for web-based communities. Asian Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.53402/ajsts.v1i1.34

Rahman, L. (2016). Governance and good governance: A theoretical framework. Public Policy and Administration Research, 6(10), 40–50.

Rizal, Y., & Siskawati, E. (2022). The role of social media in improving the transparency of village fund management. Entrepreneurship and Small Business Research, 1(2), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.55980/esber.v1i2.25

Saragih, J. (2024). Leadership and public service: Analyzing the impact of village heads in rural governance. Komitmen: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 5(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.15575/jim.v5i1.35420

Situmorang, D. R. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pengelolaan dana desa untuk mewujudkan good governance. METHOSIKA: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Methodist, 5(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.46880/jsika.Vol5No1.pp15-23

Sugiman, S. (2018). Pemerintahan desa. Binamulia Hukum, 7(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v7i1.316

Supriadin, S., & Wardan, W. (2024). Efektivitas pemanfaatan dana desa dalam meningkatkan pembangunan ekonomi dan infrastruktur pedesaan. Economica Insight, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.71094/ecoin.v1i1.17

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. (2014).

United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. UNDP.

Vike, H. (2018). Street-level bureaucracy and crosscutting cleavages in municipal worlds. Comparative Social Research, 33, 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0195-631020180000033016

World Bank. (1992). World development report 1992: Development and the environment. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24