KONSTRUKSI GENDER DALAM KOMUNITAS TATTOART DI KOTA GORONTALO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/jsga.v2i2.2602Keywords:
Gender Construction, Tattoart CommunityAbstract
Some of the women often wear clothes that tend to show. Tattoos can make them have a positive impression wherein it makes them feel sexy, cool or attractive in appearance. The reason for using a tattoo is because they like the image on the other hand because they prefer to have an image in their body which is their characteristic in their socializing. The purpose of this study was to determine the gender construction in the Tatoart community in Gorontalo City. The method used in this research is a qualitative method with data collection through observation, interviews, and documentation.
The results of the research are; Gender construction in the Tatoart Community as a style to beautify one's appearance. Tattoos are also used as a measure of association, meaning that the more tattoos the woman is assessed for the extent of her association. So that some women admit that the use of tattoos is considered more slang in front of their friends. Women who have tattoos are those who also have playmates who have tattoos, so they are influenced to get tattooed. And some women who have tattoos also reason to put tattoos because of identity. The meaning for each tattoo is different. This depends on the selection of the tattoo motif and the placement of the tattoo on the body. Women put on permanent tattoos, which are tattoos that can last a lifetime on the skin, and for placement, women who are tattooed in Gorontalo City are generally more daring to put it around the body that is not covered to make it easier to show off. is considered positive when the use of tattoos is used as art or decoration that aims to beautify the body or appearance. The self-concept of tattooed women belonging to the Gorontalo Tattooart Community (GTC) is a concept where they act in accordance with the views of themselves and others towards themselves. The tattooed woman, a member of the Gorontalo Tattooart Community (GTC), considers tattooing as an art that everyone is free to wear, and they think that they can learn a lot after using tattoos because of the many negative views from outsiders that make them even stronger individuals in carrying out the day.
References
Anwar, Rahmat. 2009. Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Fenomena Tato: Studi Deskriptif Tentang Persepsi Mahasiswa Universitas Sumatera Utara Terhadap Fenomena Tato. Medan: Skripsi Universitas Sumatera Utara
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010.Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aulia Subur, 2013. Fenomena Perempuan Bertato di Kota Yogyakarta. E-Societas. Volume 2, Number 5.
Ayu Prasista Nalendra. 2013. Makna Komunikasi Simbolik Pada Tato Bagi Wanita Pengguna Tato Di Surabaya. Surabaya: Skripsi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur.
Bertens, K. (2011). Etika. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Collhoun, F. & Acocella, Joan Ross. 1990. Psikologi Tentang Penyesuaian dan Hubungan Kemanusiaan (Edisi Ketiga). Semarang: Ikip Semarang Press.
Driayanti, Restituta. 2011. Makna Simbolik Tato Bagi Manusia Dayak Dalam Kajian Hermeneutika Paul Ricoeur. Tesis: Program Studi Filsafat Universitas Indonesia..
Fakih, Mansour. 2010. Analisis Gender & Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar
Hasanah, Uswatun. 2013. Pembentukan Identitas Dan Gambaran Diri Pada Remaja Putri Bertato Di Samarinda. Ejournal Psikologi Vol. 1. No. 2: 177-186.
Kertajaya, Hermawan. 2008. Arti komunitas :Gramedia Pustaka
Kompas. 2010. Mengenal Tato Mentawai, Seni Rajah Tertua di Dunia. Online https://pesonaindonesia.kompas.com/read/2019/04/09/205921227/mengenal-tato-mentawai-seni-rajah-tertua-di-dunia diakses tanggal 21 Januari 2020
M. Dwi Marianto dan Syamsul Barry. 2000. Tato. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian Institut Seni Indonesia.
Mahmudah, Nurul, Muammar Muammar, dan Lailatul Muthoharoh. “GENDER IN FIQH PERSPECTIVE.” SETARA: Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak 1, no. 02 (24 Desember 2019): 23–42.
Marianto, M.D & Barry, S. 2010. Tato. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian Institut Seni Indonesia
Martin H. Neumeyer, 1984. Community and Society. Suncy. Inc.
Myers, D.G. 2012. Psikologi Sosial: Buku 2. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika
Olong, HA. Kadir. 2016. Tato. Yogyakarta: PT. LKiS Pelangi Aksara
Pannen, Paulina dkk. 2001. Konstruktivisme Dalam Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Puspitawati, Herien. 2012. Gender dan Keluarga: Konsep dan Realita di Indonesia. Bogor: ITB Press
Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. 2007. Psikologi komunikasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Sanders. (2008). Customizing the body. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sobur, Alex. 2013. Psikologi Umum dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia
Soenarno, 2012. Kekuatan Komunitas Sebagai Pilar Pembangunan Nasional. Jakarta
Soerjono, S. (2009). Sosiologi suatu pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Suparno, Paul. 1997. Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.
Tong, R. P. (2008) Feminst thought. Yogyakarta dan Bandung: Jalasutra
Wenger, Etienne et al. 2012. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard. Business School
West, Richard. 2008. Pengantar Teori Komunikasi : Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta : Salemba Humanika,
Winayu, 2009. Body Image Mahasiswa Yang menggunakan Tato. Jurnal. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta