Intergenerational Arabic Learning
Rethinking Grammar Instruction Through Adaptive Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/ijalt.v7i02.11837Keywords:
Adaptive Learning Cycle, Arabic Course, Intergenerational Learning, Mixed-Age LearningAbstract
The study of Arabic grammar within mixed-age classrooms has become an increasingly observable phenomenon in contemporary language learning settings. This intergenerational composition creates a distinctive instructional environment that presents both unique challenges and meaningful opportunities for Arabic language educators. This study explores how learning unfolds and how teachers manage and respond to the diverse classroom composition. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through classroom observations, and in-depth interviews with teachers, learners, and administrators, complemented by document analysis. The data were analyzed thematically using Instructional Design Theory (IDT) as the analytical framework. Findings reveal that the age-diverse learning environment brings variations in individual needs and motivations, which are actively accommodated through an adaptive learning cycle. In this cycle, strategies are continuously adjusted in response to students’ needs and interactions, ensuring dynamic and effective classroom engagement. This study represents one of the earliest efforts in Indonesia to explore the dynamics of mixed-age Arabic language learning, providing valuable insights for designing and managing instruction in age-diverse classrooms. The findings not only offer practical pedagogical guidance for educators but also establish a foundational framework for future scholarship on intergenerational learning within Arabic language education.
References
Abdurrahman, M., Suherman, A., Masor, M., & Fadhlillah, A. M. I. (2015). Tantangan guru Bahasa Arab Madrasah Aliyah dalam perspektif kompetensi pedagogik dan profesional. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/A.V2I1.1513
Aftab, M. J., Tasleem, S., Hadayat, H., & Ali, A. (2022). Effect of mastery learning approaches in improving students' learning outcomes at elementary level. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 4(4), 692–700. 10.52567/pjsr.v4i04.883
Ahmed, S. K., Mohammed, R. A., Nashwan, A. J., Ibrahim, R. H., Abdalla, A. Q., Ameen, B. M. M., & Khdhir, R. M. (2025). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Global Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198
Aho, E., Haverinen, H.-L., Juuso, H., Laukka, S. J., & Sutinen, A. (2010). Teachers’ principles of decision-making and classroom management: A case study and a new observation method. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 395–402.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.171
Aljarelah, A. (2024). Language and international communication: The impact of language on international understanding and diplomatic relations. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 6(6), 145. 10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue06-23
Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), Article 2218191. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191
Annisa, M. N., & Safii, R. (2023). Analisis kebutuhan belajar bahasa Arab sebagai bahasa asing dalam konteks pendidikan tinggi. Eloquence: Journal of Foreign Language, 2(2). 10.58194/eloquence.v2i2.861
Ansari, A., & Purtell, K. M. (2018). Continuity and changes in classroom age composition and achievement in Head Start. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 59, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.07.002
Arifin, Z., Lubis, T., Ath-Thukhi, A. M., Alsokari, T., Ainin, M., & Taufan, M. (2024). Analyzing the problems of Arabic language learning in higher education. INSIGHT: Journal of Education and Islamic Studies, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.24036/insight.v3i3.193
Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058
Cronin, Z. (2019). To mix or not to mix: A critical review of literature on mixed-age groups in primary schools. Cambridge Open-Review Educational Research e-Journal, 6, 165. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.46563
Fauzie, M. S., Syihabul Ihsan Al-Haqiqy, M., Triwibowo, M., & Mustofa, S. (2023). Exploring the position and role of Arabic in Indonesian society: A descriptive analysis. Al-Ta’rib: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab IAIN Palangka Raya, 11(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.23971/altarib.v11i2.6899
González-Fernández, R., Ruiz-Cabezas, A., Medina Domínguez, M. C., Subía-Álava, A. B., & Delgado Salazar, J. L. (2024). Teachers’ teaching and professional competences assessment. Evaluation and Program Planning, 103, Article 102396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102396
Hammad, H. S. (2025). Teaching the digital natives: Examining the learning needs and preferences of Gen Z learners in higher education. Transcultural Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 214–242. 10.21608/tjhss.2025.346098.1303
Husamah, H., Azizah, J., Permana, T. I., & Setyaningrum, Y. (2025). Strengthening teacher professional programs: Insights from Scopus AI. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22219/jppg.v6i1.40646
Kurnila, V. S., Juniati, D., & Lukito, A. (2025). Implementation, principles and stages of differentiated instruction in mathematics learning: A systematic literature review. TEM Journal, 14(1), 727–740. DOI: 10.18421/TEM141-65
Magnusson, L. O., & Bäckman, K. (2022). Teaching and learning in age-homogeneous groups versus mixed-age groups in the preschool – The Swedish example. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2109802. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2109802
Maksum, A., & Jumaha, N. (2024). Kebijakan pembelajaran bahasa Arab di Indonesia dalam kurikulum madrasah. Jurnal Kajian Penelitian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (JKPPK), 2(4), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.59031/jkppk.v2i4.598
Maswani, & Umbar, K. (2024). Arabic for specific purposes (ASP) in Indonesian context: A review of the Indonesian qualifications framework (IQF). In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Islamic and Muhammadiyah Studies (ICIS and APCoMS 2024), Banjarmasin, Indonesia, June 17–18. EUDL. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-6-2024.2349073
Melesse, T., & Belay, S. (2022). Differentiating instruction in primary and middle schools: Does variation in students’ learning attributes matter? Cogent Education, 9(1), Article 2105552. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2105552
Mislikhah, S. (2024). Penerapan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA) 22, 371–381. 10.25170/kolita.22.5992
Mukhalalati, B. A., & Taylor, A. (2019). Adult learning theories in context: A quick guide for healthcare professional educators. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519840332
Parrott, H. M., & Cohen, L. E. (2021). Advantages of mixed-age free play in elementary school: perceptions of students, teachers, and parents. International Journal of Play, 10(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2021.1878774
Pennycook, A. (2024). The importance of learning foreign languages in a globalized world. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 9(2), 7. http://jflet.com/jflet/
Peredrienko, T., & Istomina, E. (2017). Placement test validation: Ways of improvement. In Proceedings of the International Technology, Education and Development Conference. 10.21125/inted.2017.1456
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 5–29). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sangiuliano Intra, F., Nasti, C., Massaro, R., Perretta, A. J., Di Girolamo, A., Brighi, A., & Biroli, P. (2023). Flexible learning environments for a sustainable lifelong learning process for teachers in the school context. Sustainability, 15(14), 11237.https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411237
Sarip, M., Khambali, K., & Sanusi, A. (2024). Arabic learning implementation of PjBL-based e-learning in the Islamic education study program of the State University of Jakarta. Alsuniyat: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Arab, 7(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.17509/alsuniyat.v7i1.67439
Schoenherr, J., Strohmaier, A. R., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Learning with visualizations helps: A meta-analysis of visualization interventions in mathematics education. Education Research Review, 100639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100639
Smit, R., & Engeli, E. (2015). An empirical model of mixed-age teaching. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.004
Tajik, O., Golzar, J., & Noor, S. (2024). Purposive sampling. International Journal of Education and Language Studies, 2(2). 10.22034/ijels.2025.490681.1029
Twenge, J. M. (2023). Generations: The real differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers, and Silents—and what they mean for America’s future. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 75(3), 212–214. 10.56315/PSCF12-23Twenge
Zayko, T., & Vinichenko, V. (2022). Generational theory: An overview of the research conducted. In V. K. Korneev (Ed.), International Scientific Siberian Transport Forum TransSiberia – 2021. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-96383-5_88
Zikriah, Z., & Mauludiyah, L. (2024). Research trend of Arabic language teaching in the world: Systematic literature review based on Scopus database. Research and Development in Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.31847
van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Frèrejean, J., Dolmans, D., van Merriënboer, J., & Visscher, A. J. (2019). Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539013
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Amalia Anandiar, Maman Abdurrahman, Mia Nurmala

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







