LIQUIDITY AND CREDIT RISK: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS IN INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/finansia.v7i1.8918Keywords:
Liquidity; Credit Risk; Islamic and Conventional BankAbstract
Islamic banking is only a small choice for the majority of Indonesian Muslims numbering 229.62 million people or 87.2%. In contrast, the market share of Islamic banks is only 7.07%. Global banking conditions are rocked by the case of Silicon Valley Bank, which is one of the largest banks in the world, experiencing liquidity problems. This is inseparable from the fragility of the conventional banking system based on usury as an inherent obligation. This study analyzes the liquidity and credit risk comparison of Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia. The sample in this study is 10 Islamic banks and the 10 largest conventional banks in terms of assets in the 2018-2022 period. Independent t-test is used to answer the problems in this study. Based on the results of independent t test show that there is no difference between the liquidity of Islamic and conventional banks. Likewise, NPF / NPL shows no difference between Islamic and conventional banks.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Firdaus Firdaus, Nur Azlina, Imam Fakhruddin, Rino Riyaldi, Romzie Rosman- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.