Diskresi Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Dispensasi Kawindi Pengadilan Agama Sukadana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/syakhshiyyah.v3i1.7255Keywords:
Discretion, Judge, Marriage dispensationAbstract
Discretion means independence and authority. Independence from the essence of discretion is independence and freedom to take appropriate actions. At the same time, authority is the power of decision in determining the applicable law. The nature of this discretion is following the position and authority of the judge as the executor of legal power. As expressly stated in the Constitution, judges are independent judiciary administrators and this is following Article 24 of the 1945 Constitution which refers to Article 21 of RI Law No. 4 of 2004 and its relation to legal freedom in marriage. and regarding the relationship with the marriage dispensation case, the judge based on the evidence will confirm the facts, namely that there is a valid reason according to law for the dispensation and after there is a reason, the judge will consider the law. The research used by researchers in this study is empirical or sociological legal research. Empirical or sociological research or field research. The nature of this research is descriptive. Descriptive research. Prescriptive research is research that aims to provide an overview or formulate a problem based on existing conditions or facts. The results of the study show that judges do not only base their decisions on laws and regulations but also use their power and freedom to make fair decisions based on their conscience. The judge granted many divorce requests submitted to the Sukadana Religious Court. This is because the judge prioritizes the concept of maslahah. The wisdom of the judges of the Sukadana Religious Court in accepting applications for marriage certificates is included in the category of "Hifd al-Nasl" (safeguarding offspring) in the Maqashid Syariah theory. This effort is seen as a way to prevent the applicant's child from committing adultery.
References
Abdul Halim Mushthofa. “Ijtihad Hakim dalam Penerapan Konsep Contra Legem pada Penetapan Perkara di Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Legitima Vol. 1, No. 1 (2019): 8.
Andrea Ata Ujan. Filsafat Hukum-Membangung Hukum, Membela Keadilan. Cetakan V. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2009.
Cholid Narbuko dan Abu Achmadi. Metodologi penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2016.
Dachran Busthami. “Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Jilid 46, 2017, 339–40. 10.14710/mmh.46.4.2017.336-342
Dian Siti Kusumawardani. “Laporan Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Tahun 2021.” Sukadana: Pengadilan Agama Sukadana, 2021.
Edi Riadi. Dinamika Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia dalam Bidang Perdata Islam. Jakarta: Gramata Publishing, 2011.
Joko Subagyo. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004.
M. Syuib dan Nadhilah Filzah. “Kewenangan Hakim Menerapkan Diskresi dalam Permohonan Dispensasi Nikah (Studi Kasus di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho).” Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol. 2, No. 2 (2018): 436. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v2i2.4747
Mubarok. “Diskresi Hukum dan Kaitannya dengan Ijtihad.” Jurnal STAIN Syariah, 13.
Nurul Inayah. “Penetapan Dispensasi Nikah Akibat Hamil Di Luar Nikah Di Pengadilan Agama Yogyakarta Tahun 2010-2015 (Analisis Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama).” Jurnal Al-Ahwal Vol. 10, No. 2 (2017): 179.
“Pasal 1 UU No. 35 Tahun 2014,”
“Pasal 15 Ayat (1), (2) Kompilasi Hukum Islam,”
“Pasal 27 ayat (2) huruf d Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014,”
Republik Indonesia. “Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, bab VII, pasal 22 ayat (1),”
Royhan A Rasyid. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.
Rusli Pandika. Hukum Dispensasi Nikah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Sugiarti, dkk. Desain Penelitian Kualitatif Sastra. Malang: Univeritas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2020.
