Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Penuntut Umum dalam Mengajukan Peninjauan Kembali Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XXI/2023

Penulis

  • Yuli Nurmala Sari Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
  • Ernawati Huroiroh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/siyasah.v4i1.9105

Kata Kunci:

Jaksa Penuntut Umum, Kejaksaan, Keadilan, Kepastian, Kemanfaatan.

Abstrak

law enforcement efforts in Indonesia, there are several institutions that play a role, one of which is the Prosecutor's Office which acts as the highest institution authorized to carry out the pre-prosecution stage and the prosecution stage in the field of law. The main role of the Prosecutor's Office is to realize justice and the rule of law in Indonesia. With a normative research method, this research uses a statutory approach, concept approach and case approach. This study aims to consider the fulfillment of legal objectives on the limitation or limitation of the authority of the Prosecutor's Office (Public Prosecutor) in filing a judicial review. The results of this study indicate that legal objectives which include justice, certainty, and legal benefits cannot be achieved simultaneously because even the Public Prosecutor (under the auspices of the Prosecutor's Office) which is the only institution authorized to prosecute in law enforcement in Indonesia until now still has limited authority in terms of upholding justice. Which is where the entire series of legal efforts should be carried out by every party who has an interest in law enforcement efforts that can fulfill the three (3) objectives of law, namely Certainty, Justice and Benefit.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

Huroiroh, Ernawati, Disharmonisasi Kompetensi Absolut PTUN Pasca Berlakunya Undang-undang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Jurnal Sosio Yustisia Vol.2 No.2, 2022.
Kemal, Guyus, Skripsi: Kewenangan Kejaksaan Sebagai Single Prosecution System (Sistem Penuntutan Tunggal) Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Semarang, Unissula, 2023.
Bentham, Jeremy, Teori Perundang-undangan; Prinsip-Prinsip Legislasi, Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana, Nusa Media & Nuansa, Bandung, 2006.
Rawls, John, Teori Keadilan: Dasar-dasar Filsafat Politik untuk Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam Negara, terjemahan oleh Uzair Fauzan dan Heru Prasetyo, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2006 Terjemahan buku John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999).
Soesilo, M. Karjadi & R, Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHAP), Bogor, Politea, 1988.
Putri, Nur Ananda dkk, Kedudukan Peninjauan Kembali Jaksa Penuntut Umum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 20/PUU-XXI/2023, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Pidana Vol. 6 No.2, 2023.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, KENCANA (Divisi dari PrenadaMedia Group), Jakarta, 2008.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012.
Purwandari, Siwi, Pengantar Teori Hukum, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2019 Terjemahan buku Hans Kelsen, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (Claredon Press-Oxford, 1996).
Sagama, Suwardi, Analisis Konsep Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum Dan Kemanfaatan Dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan, Mazahib Vol. XV No.1, 2016.
Sinaga, V. Harlen, Hukum Acara Perdata dengan Pemahaman Hukum Materiil, Erlangga, Jakarta, 2015.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-08-20

Cara Mengutip

Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Penuntut Umum dalam Mengajukan Peninjauan Kembali Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 20/PUU-XXI/2023. (2024). Siyasah Jurnal Hukum Tatanegara, 4(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.32332/siyasah.v4i1.9105

Artikel Serupa

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.