AI-assisted lesson planning in English language teaching: Teachers’ perceptions, practices, and ethical concerns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v14i1.13364Keywords:
Artificial Intelligent (AI), Educational Technology, English Language Teaching (ELT), Lesson Planning, Teacher PerceptionAbstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly transformed educational practices, including lesson planning in English language teaching (ELT). While AI tools are widely recognized for supporting instructional preparation, limited attention has been given to how English teachers in local school contexts perceive, use, and critically evaluate AI-assisted lesson planning. This qualitative descriptive study examined English teachers’ perceptions, practices, and ethical concerns regarding the use of AI tools in designing English lesson plans. Data were collected through a questionnaire completed by 14 English teachers from elementary and junior high schools in Banjarmasin, Indonesia, and semi-structured interviews with three selected participants. Questionnaire responses were analyzed descriptively, while interview data were examined through thematic analysis. The findings reveal that teachers perceived AI tools as useful for saving time, generating instructional ideas, organizing lesson materials, and supporting creativity in English lesson preparation. However, teachers also expressed concerns about the accuracy of AI-generated content, over-reliance on AI, data privacy, and the alignment of AI outputs with curriculum goals and learners’ needs. The study suggests that AI can meaningfully support ELT lesson planning when used critically, ethically, and under teachers’ professional judgment. It further highlights the need for systematic training and institutional guidance to help teachers integrate AI tools responsibly without diminishing their pedagogical autonomy and instructional accountability.
References
Alasgarova, R., & Rzayev, J. (2025). The implications of artificial intelligence for teacher agency and teacher-student relationships through the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 9(3), 450–473. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.645
An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023b). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187–5208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z
An, Y., & James, S. (2025). Generative AI integration in K-12 settings: Teachers’ perceptions and levels of integration. TechTrends, 69(6), 1304–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01114-9
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Belloula, S. (2025a). Empowering educators: Leveraging AI to revolutionize lesson planning. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 11(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1295
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Bozkurt, A., Xiao, F., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., Farrow, R., Bond, M., Nerantzi, C., Honeychurch, S., Dron, J., Mir, K., Stewart, B., Stewart, B., Costello, E., Mason, J., Stracke, C., Romero-Hall, E., & Jandric, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. 18, 53–130. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636568
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, I(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
Chiu, T. K. F., Ahmad, Z., Ismailov, M., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171
Chounta, I.-A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2022). Exploring Teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 725–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4 th). SAGE.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dornburg, A., & Davin, K. J. (2025). ChatGPT in foreign language lesson plan creation: Trends, variability, and historical biases. ReCALL, 37(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344024000272
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Erdogan, F., Tutak, T., & Polat, M. (2026). The effect of pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ AI literacy and ethical use of information technologies on their ethical reflections on AI. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 25(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/26.25.22
Greene Nolan, H., Coenraad, M., & Young, V. M. (2024). Teaching Partner, Grading Assistant, Substitute Teacher: Three Ways Teachers Positioned an Artificial Intelligence Tool in Writing Instruction. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/226
Hammoud, R. (2025). Exploring chemistry teachers’ knowledge and perceptions of AI: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 11(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3584
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education. In Data ethics: Building trust: How digital technologies can serve humanity (pp. 621–653). Globethics Publications. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
Jang, M., & Lee, H. W. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ education needs for AI-based education competency. Educational Technology International, 24(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.23095/ETI.2023.24.2.143.
Karakaya, K., Alpat, M. F., Uçar, H., Karakaya, Ö., & Bozkurt, A. (2025). Preparing teachers for the algorithmic educational landscape: A critical mapping of generative AI integration in language teacher education. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 7(2), 102841. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v7n2.102841
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kerr, R. C., & Kim, H. (2025). From prompts to plans: A case study of pre-service EFL teachers’ use of generative AI for lesson planning. English Teaching, 80(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.80.1.202503.95
Kim, W. J. (2026). Teachers’ use of generative artificial intelligence for designing science lessons in dupport of environmental science agency. Research in Science Education, 56(1), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10262-0
Kılıçkaya, F., & Kic-Drgas, J. (2025). Pre-service language teachers’ experiences and perceptions of integrating generative AI in practicum-based lesson study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1478. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05715-w
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023a). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Kristiawan, D., Bashar, K., & Pradana, D. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence in English language learning: A systematic review of AI tools, applications, and pedagogical outcomes. The Art of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TATEFL), 5(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.36663/tatefl.v5i2.912
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1
Law, L. (2024). Application of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in language teaching and learning: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174
Lestari, S., & Yusuf, F. N. (2025). Aligning assessment practices with learning objectives: A case of EFL classes in Indonesia. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 10(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v10i1.1973
Liu-Yun, Z., & Yuan, W. (2025). Primary school teachers’ perceptions of using generative artificial intelligence in lesson planning in Liaoning, China. Journal of Buddhist Education and Research, 11(3), 326–333.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed. In Pearson.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators. System, 122, 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103290
Moundridou, M., Matzakos, N., & Doukakis, S. (2024). Generative AI tools as educators’ assistants: Designing and implementing inquiry-based lesson plans. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100277
Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M., & Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI ‐powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J., Chu, S., & Shen, M. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Commision. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293
Rouffet, C., Van Beuningen, C., & De Graaff, R. (2023). Constructive alignment in foreign language curricula: An exploration of teaching and assessment practices in Dutch secondary education. The Language Learning Journal, 51(3), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2025542
Sari, D. K., Supahar, S., Rosana, D., Dinata, P. A. C., & Istiqlal, M. (2025). Measuring artificial intelligence literacy: The perspective of Indonesian higher education students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202531879
Sengsri, S., & Khunratchasana, K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Competence: A crucial skill for the digital Ccitizens. International Education Studies, 17(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v17n3p75
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Söğüt, S. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in EFL writing: A pedagogical stance of pre-service teachers and teacher trainers. Focus on ELT Journal, 6(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.14744/felt.6.1.5
Son, J.-B., Ružić, N. K., & Philpott, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence technologies and applications for language learning and teaching. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 5(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0015
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2011). Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139042789
Traga Philippakos, Z. A., & Rocconi, L. (2025). AI literacy: Elementary and secondary teachers’ use of AI-tools, reported confidence, and professional development needs. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091186
van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Vivian, C. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (Fourth). Hodder Education, an Hatchette UK Company.
Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
Zhai, X. (2025). Transforming teachers’ roles and agencies in the era of generative AI: Perceptions, acceptance, knowledge, and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(6), 1323–1333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10174-0
Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Isnainah Qumainah, Yuniar Rahmadini, Noor Maulidiyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




