Reconstructing Contemporary Legal Methodology through the Noetic Triadic Spiral Model: A Trans-Epistemological Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13039Keywords:
Islamic Legal Methodology; Noetic Triadic Spiral Model; Trans-Epistemological Framework; Usul al-Fiqh.Abstract
This study aims to reconstruct contemporary legal methodology by proposing the Noetic Triadic Spiral Model as a trans-epistemological framework that integrates revelation (waḥy), reason (ʿaql), and empirical reality (wāqiʿ) in a dynamic and iterative structure. The research responds to the growing epistemic fragmentation between normative-textual approaches and socio-empirical legal reasoning in contemporary Islamic legal thought. It seeks to formulate a methodological model that bridges classical uṣūl al-fiqh with contemporary interdisciplinary demands without undermining its theological foundations. This research employs a qualitative normative-philosophical approach combined with conceptual analysis and critical hermeneutics. Primary sources include classical works of uṣūl al-fiqh and modern reformist legal theories, which are analyzed through a comparative-constructive method. The study also incorporates epistemological mapping to identify structural tensions between scriptural authority, rational deliberation, and socio-historical contingencies. Through this approach, the Noetic Triadic Spiral Model is formulated as a spiral (rather than linear) interaction among three epistemic domains, emphasizing continuous reinterpretation, reflexivity, and contextual validation. The findings demonstrate that the proposed model offers a coherent methodological reconstruction that transcends the dichotomy between textualism and contextualism. By conceptualizing legal reasoning as a spiral process of noetic engagement—where revelation provides normative orientation, reason ensures coherence and systematicity, and empirical reality functions as a field of verification—the model strengthens methodological adaptability while preserving doctrinal integrity. The spiral nature ensures that interpretation remains open to revision without collapsing into relativism. The scientific contribution of this study lies in its formulation of a trans-epistemological paradigm that rearticulates legal methodology beyond classical dualisms. It provides a theoretical bridge between traditional jurisprudential structures and contemporary legal challenges, contributing to ongoing debates on reform, renewal (tajdīd), and methodological integration in legal theory. The Noetic Triadic Spiral Model thus offers an innovative framework for rethinking legal reasoning in a plural, complex, and rapidly evolving global context.
References
Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1995.
Alias, Muhammad Nazir, Muhammad Najib Abdullah, Mohd Farihal Osman, Nor Faizah Ismail, and Mohd Sham Kamis. ‘The Position of Maqasid Al-Shariah within Islamic Legal Sources: A Comprehensive Analysis’. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (July 2025): 937–964. https://doi.org/10.22373/q4byre51.
Amuli, Ayatullah Jawadi. The Status of Reason in the Life of Man. Qom: Isra Publication, 1905.
Ansori. ‘Position of Fatwa in Islamic Law: The Effectiveness of MUI, NU, and Muhammadiyah Fatwas’. Ijtihad Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 22, no. 1 (2022): 53–71. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i1.53-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i1.53-72
Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: IIIT, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg
Aulia, M. Z., B. F. Hantoro, W. Sanjaya, and m. Ali. ‘The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication’. Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 3 (2023): 423–450. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk3034
Bhaskar, Roy. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso, 2008.
Blau, Adrian. ‘Social Science and Its Critics: An Ideological Analysis’. Social Philosophy and Policy 41, no. 1 (June 2024): 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052524000372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052524000372
Budiono, A., Y. Prasetyo, K. Wardiono, W. Yuspin, K. Dimyati, and D. Iriani. ‘Legal Conscience and the Pressure of the Formal Law System’. Wisdom 2, no. 22 (2022): 223–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v22i2.790
Budiono, A., W. Yuspin, S. S. Nurani, F. Fairuzzaman, S. W. A. Pradnyawan, and S. D. Sari. ‘The Anglo-Saxon System of Common Law and the Development of the Legal System in Indonesia’. WSEAS Transactions on Systems 22, no. 2023 (2023): 207–213. https://doi.org/10.37394/23202.2023.22.21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23202.2023.22.21
Dewanti, S. ‘Standard Assessment Model for Scientific Integration-Interconnection as Material for Evaluation of Vision and Mission Achievement’. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran 9, no. 3 (2023): 771. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.8638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.8638
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.
Fanani, A., A. I. Hamzani, N. Khasanah, and A. Sofanudin. ‘Muhammadiyah’s Manhaj Tarjih: An Evolution of a Modernist Approach to Islamic Jurisprudence in Indonesia’. Hts Teologiese Studies Theological Studies 77, no. 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V77I4.6942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6942
Fatarib, Husnul, Zezen Zainul Ali, Nur Aziz Arifin, Abdul Najib, and Muhammad Nur Fathoni. ‘Progressive Legal Reasoning in Contemporary Islamic Legal Reform: Negotiating the Maqāṣid and Hermeneutic Approaches’. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 24, no. 2 (December 2025): 277–294. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i2.16123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i2.16123
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum, 2004.
Golden, B. Critical Legal Studies, Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of Legal Education. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035302932.ch30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035302932.ch30
Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon Press, 1971.
Hallaq, Wael B. Authority, Continuity and Change in Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495557
Hammadi, Hammad Farhan, Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed, Fajar Amansyah, Ahmad Rajafi, Omer Mohamed Taha Alkanan, and Israa Natiq Jabbar. ‘Contemporary Challenges and the Future of Islamic Law: Toward Ethical and Institutional Renewal’. Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 14, no. 1 (June 2025): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v14i1.58186.
———. ‘Contemporary Challenges and the Future of Islamic Law: Toward Ethical and Institutional Renewal’. Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan 14, no. 1 (June 2025): 43–61. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v14i1.58186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/al-daulah.v14i1.58186
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell, 1927.
Helaluddin, and Hengki Wijaya. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Sebuah Tinjauan Teori & Praktik. Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray, 2019.
‘Hermeneutics Controvercies in Contemporary Islamic Studies’. Kalam 17, no. 2 (December 2023): 147–170. https://doi.org/10.24042/002023171465000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/002023171465000
Huda, Ni’Matul, Idul Rishan, and Dian Kus Pratiwi. ‘Fast-Track Legislation: The Transformation of Law-Making Under Joko Widodo’s Administration’. Yustisia 13, no. 1 (2024): 117–133. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i1.71061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i1.71061
Hussain, Mr Shakir, and Dr Ashfaq Ahmed. ‘Maqasid Al-Shariah and Its Influence on Islamic Governance and Policy: A Framework for Contemporary Reform’. Journal of Religion and Society 4, no. 02 (October 2025): 277–287.
Karimullah, Suud Sarim. ‘From Divine Revelation to Legal Practice: Contextualizing Islamic Law in the Contemporary Era’. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 59, no. 1 (June 2025): 36–47. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v59i1.1336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v59i1.1336
Kasman, M., and A. Budiono. ‘Reception of Muslims to the Ḥadīth Prohibition of Praying for Non-Muslim Spirits in a Multi-Religious Society’. Journal of Ecohumanism 3, no. 4 (2024): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3457.
Kjelling, A. G., and S. Markeng. ‘Because I Have Knowledge’: Young Muslims’ Experiences of Moving between the Mosque and the Public School’. British Journal of Religious Education, 2025, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2025.2524035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2025.2524035
Laksana, Andri Winjaya, Muhammad Ridwan Lubis, Denny Suwondo, Muhammad Ngazis, and Ratih Mega Puspa Sari. ‘Integrating Maqasid Al-Shari’ah in Contemporary Islamic Legal Reform on Drug Policy’. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (June 2025): 416–439. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10665
Li, Jingyang, Shengli Song, Sitong Yan, Guangneng Hu, Chengen Lai, and Yulong Zhou. ‘Advanced Dialog State Tracking with Noetic Graphs for Complex Human-Machine Interactions’. Pattern Recognition 168 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111842
Lukács, Georg. History and Class Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1971.
Mahdi, Imam, Etry Mike, and Arini Azka Mutia. ‘Contextualizing Islamic Law in Resolving Customary Land Conflicts: A Siyasah Syar’iyyah Approach to the Semende Tribe’s Dispute in Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park’. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan 12, no. 2 (November 2025): 696–710. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8619
Maryanto, Muh Isna Nurdin Wibisana, and Bambang Sumardjoko. ‘Contemporary Islamic Legal Perspectives on Qualification Policy Politics in Indonesia’. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 2 (August 2025): 1009–1027. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11305
Milleer, Sophia Anne. ‘Integrating Local Wisdom and Global Knowledge to Develop Culturally Responsive Education Models’. Nusantara Education 5, no. 1 (March 2026): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaraeducation.v5i1.257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaraeducation.v5i1.257
Nonet, Philippe, and Philip Selznick. Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Milton Park, Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor and Francis, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203787540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203787540
Nugraha, Amal Teguh. ‘Contemporary International Treaties Seen From the Principles of Maqasid Ash-Shariah’. Law and Justice 7, no. 1 (October 2022): 63–75. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v7i1.604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v7i1.604
Nurani, Nina, Apriwandi Apriwandi, and Hafied Noor Bagja. ‘Intellectual Property Rights Law Reform Based on Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah as a Model for Green Business-Based Creative Industry Protection to Support Sustainable Development’. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 18, no. 1 (February 2026): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v18i1.40840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v18i1.40840
Prawira, Ilham Abdi, Rahmad Setyawan, and Fahlul Ulum Ahmad Adnani. ‘The Paradigm Shift of Maqāṣid Al-Syarī’ah in Contemporary Society: From Protection to Development’. Academica: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies 9, no. 2 (December 2025): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.22515/academica.v9i2.14126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/academica.v9i2.14126
Rafiu, Achmad, Muh Alghifari, and Kurniati. ‘The Maqasid Syariah Paradigm as an Innovation in Islamic Law in Jasser Auda’s Thought’. Al-Ilmiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 1, no. 4 (February 2026): 1845–1854.
Reeves, Josh A. ‘Exemplars in “Science and Religion”: A Theological Dialogue with Thomas Kuhn’. Religious Studies 61 (2025): 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412523000975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412523000975
Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: TCU Press, 1976.
Rofiq, M. ‘Arab Political Reasoning: Muhammad Abid al-Jabiri’s Contribution for Understanding Crisis of Politics in the Arab World’. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 7, no. 1 (2017): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v7i1.55-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v7i1.55-76
Rohid, Nibrosu, Rahma Sugihartati, Bagong Suyanto, Daniel Susilo, and Afriul Zikri. ‘Digital Activism in Contemporary Islamic Politics: A Critical Analysis of Social Media’s Impact on Islamic Movements’. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (April 2025): 208–233. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10159
Safi, L. The Foundation of Knowledge: A Comparative Study in Islamic and Western Methods of Inquiry. Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Press, 1996.
Salaeh, A., N. Saha, N. Khair, D. Djabir, and P. Hamed. ‘Character Education Concepts in Ihya’ Ulumuddin’. Southeast Asian Journal of Islamic Education 5, no. 2 (2023): 231–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/sajie.v5i2.6398
Schuon, Frithjof. The Transcendent Unity of Religions. Wheaton: Quest Books, 1993.
Setyawan, Vincentius, and Bariah Safrut. ‘Rethinking Law and Justice: The Core Principles of Critical Legal Studies against Legal Formalism’. NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 4, no. 2 (October 2025): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17332128.
———. ‘Rethinking Law and Justice: The Core Principles of Critical Legal Studies against Legal Formalism’. NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 4, no. 2 (October 2025): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17332128.
Siddiq, Armia Muhammad. ‘Constitutional Court and Judicial Review: Lesson Learned for Indonesia’. Negara Hukum 8, no. 1 (2017): 107–130. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v8i1.940.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2008.
Solum, Lawrence B. ‘Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centred Theory of Judging’. Metaphilosophy 34, nos 1–2 (2003): 178–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00268
Sukris, Ahmad, Anwar Hafidzi, Nurul Listiyani, Tetiana Kolomoiets, and Afif Khalid. ‘Restorative Justice Principles in Banjar Customary Inheritance Disputes: A Normative Analysis of Out-of-Court Settlement Institutions through Adat Badamai’. El-Mashlahah 15, no. 2 (December 2025): 415–436. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.10047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.10047
Sulfinadia, Hamda, Jurna Petri Roszi, Mega Puspita, A’zizil Fadli, and Amirulhakim bin Ahmad Nadzri. ‘Negotiating Islamic Inheritance and Customary Law: Functional Legal Pluralism and Matrilineal Pusako Randah in Minangkabau’. Journal of Islamic Law 7, no. 1 (February 2026): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v7i1.3743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v7i1.3743
Surahman, Abdurrahim, W. Anandy, F. Hamdani, and U. Nnawulezi. ‘Administrative Justice in the Perspective of Islamic Legal Philosophy: A Comparative Study of Ethical Legitimacy and Bureaucratic Rationality’. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani 12, no. 2 (2025): 751–769. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8269
Suteki, and A. Natalis. ‘Mainstreaming Progressive Law: Toward an Emancipatory Paradigm in Legal Higher Education’. Cadernos de Dereito Actual 2025, no. 27 (2025): 160–183.
Tabrozi, D. ‘Ijtihad Maqashid Sharia in the Thought of Asy-Syatibi and Muhammad At-Tahir Ibn Ashur’. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum 13, no. 1 (2025): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v13i1.4068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v13i1.4068
Tamanaha, Brian Z. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
Trivedi, Hemal P. ‘A Comparative Model of Mysticism: Cognitive Neuroscience, Phenomenal Experiences, and Noetic Accounts’. Archive for the Psychology of Religion 47, no. 2 (2025): 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/00846724241265870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00846724241265870
Wardiono, K. ‘Prophetic: An Epistemological Offer for Legal Studies’. Journal of Law and Justice 1, no. 1 (2019): 17–41. https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v1i1.8797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v1i1.8797
Wardiono, Kelik, Dimyati Khudzaifah, W. Yuspin, Tasyha Panji Nugraha, A. Budiono, and S. Rochman. ‘Epistemology of Legal Studies: Research Method Characteristics of Theoretical Law Bearers in Indonesia’. Journal of Ecohumanism 3, no. 3 (2024): 814–854. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i3.3374
Zagzebski. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174763
Zakiy, A., E. Saputra, and M. Ulfah. ‘Konstruksi Nalar Arab Dalam Buku Takwin Al-Aql Al-Araby Karya Muhammad Abid Al-Jabiri’. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO) 1, no. 1 (2024): 469–481. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v1i1.53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v1i1.53
Zaprulkhan, Zaprulkhan. ‘Maqāṣid Al-Shariah in the Contemporary Islamic Legal Discourse: Perspective of Jasser Auda’. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 26, no. 2 (December 2018): 445–472. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231.
———. ‘Maqāṣid Al-Shariah in the Contemporary Islamic Legal Discourse: Perspective of Jasser Auda’. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 26, no. 2 (December 2018): 445–472. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.26.2.3231
Zuhdi, Muhammad Harfin, and Mohamad Abdun Nasir. ‘Al-Mashlahah and Reinterpretation of Islamic Law in Contemporary Context’. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 3 (October 2024): 1818–1839. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i3.24918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i3.24918
Zulfa, Firda Arina, Mukhsin Achmad, Davud Soylu, and Fadhil. ‘Mapping Contemporary Islamic Legal Thought in Indonesia: A Dialog Between Fiqh And The Culture of the Archipelago’. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH) 7, no. 1 (March 2025): 177–202. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss1.art10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss1.art10
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kelik Wardiono, Arief Budiono, Isman Isman, Arova Bakhtiar, Dwinuryidha Ken Rifqi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
