Problems of the Formulation of Asset Forfeiture Resulting from Corruption Crimes: A Comparative and Conceptual Study

Sry Karina Br. Sinuhaji; Mar'ie Mahfudz Harahap

doi:10.32332/istinbath.v21i01.9695

Authors

Sry Karina Br. Sinuhaji Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Mar'ie Mahfudz Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v21i01.9695

Keywords:

Asset Forfeiture, Corruption Crimes, Comperative and Conceptual Study

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia has long been a severe transnational issue requiring appropriate handling. Although Law No. 31 of 1999 and Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of Corruption have provided a legal basis for combating corruption, weaknesses remain in their implementation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these laws by employing a legislative approach and analyzing the opinions of scholars. The primary focus of this research is on asset confiscation resulting from corruption, as regulated by the Anti-Corruption Law, which serves as a key instrument in combating corruption. The findings indicate that unclear legal norms and weak coordination among law enforcement agencies still hinder the implementation of asset confiscation. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the need for regulatory improvements and enhanced coordination among institutions to maximize the effectiveness of asset confiscation in efforts to eradicate corruption in Indonesia

References

Ahmad Syarbaini. “Konsep Korupsi Menurut Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam 16, no. 1 (2022): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v16i1.48.

Anwar, Qosim Khoiri. “BUDAYA TAZIR BIL MAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF ULAMA KONVENSIONAL.” Fikri 1, no. 2 (2016): 262–390.

Az-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Al-Fiqhu Al-Islamiyyu Wa Adillatuhu Jilid 5. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2007.

Caliano Anugerah, Dandy, Intan Putri Dwi Agustin, Muhammad Rifki Pradana, and Tejo Hendri Pangistu. “Penerapan Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Anti Korupsi 3, no. 2 (2023): 62–72. https://doi.org/10.19184/jak.v3i2.November2023.

Djufri, Darmadi, Derry Angling Kesuma, and Kinaria Afriani. “MODEL PENGEMBALIAN ASET (ASSET RECOVERY) SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF MEMULIHKAN KERUGIAN NEGARA DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” Disiplin : Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda 26, no. 2 (2020): 120–32.

Ghulam Reza, Muhammad. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perampasan Aset ‘Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture’ Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 8, no. 1 (2024): 1167–81.

Gunawan, Cepy Indra. “Perampasan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Rangka Pengembalian Aset Negara.” HAngoluan Law Review 1, no. 1 (2022): 107–37. https://dataindonesia.id/sektor-riil/detail/angka-konsumsi-ikan-ri-naik-jadi-5648-kgkapita-pada-2022.

Hafid, Irwan. “Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 6, no. 3 (2021): 465–80. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss3.art3.

Jumali, Endang. “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Ta‘Zîr Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Asy-Syari’ah 16, no. 2 (2014): 113–24. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v16i2.631.

Listyorini, Dyah, Adi Suliantoro, and Fitika Andraini. “Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Terhadap Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Pada Mahasiswa Universitas STIKUBANK Semarang.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha 9, no. 1 (2021): 223–32.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press. Vol. 1. Mataram University Press, 2020. https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rce/article/download/1659/1508%0Ahttp://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/qre/article/view/1348%5Cnhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500799708666915%5Cnhttps://mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Educa.

Nugraha, Sigit Prabawa. “Kebijakan Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” National Conference For Law Studies, 2020, 978–79.

Nurhalimah, Siti. “Penghapusan Pidana Korupsi Melalui Pengembalian Kerugian Negara.” ’Adalah 1, no. 11 (2017): 105–6. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v1i11.11419.

Pinem, Srimin, Muhammad Yusrizal, and Adi Syaputra. “Dinamika Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Yuridis 10, no. 2 (2023): 87–94.

Pranoto, Agus, Abadi B Darmo, Iman Hidayat, Hukum Pidana Indonesia, and A Latar Belakang Masalah. “Kajian Yuridis Mengenai Perampasan Aset Korupsi.” Jurnal Legalitas X (2018): 91–121.

Pratama, Riko Aji, and Muhamad Hasan Sebyar. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Lex Scientia Law Review 1, no. 4 (2016): 137–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i4.291.

Saipon, Abdul. “Nilai Pendidikan Wanita Dalam Surat Al-Ahzab Ayat 28-35 Dan Ayat 59 Serta Aplikasinya Dalam Pendidikan Islam.” Tawazun: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 12, no. 2 (2019): 4–11. https://doi.org/10.32832/tawazun.v12i2.2610.

Saleh, Roeslan. Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2020.

Selfi Suriyadinata, and Ananda Putra Rezeki. “Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Ketatanegaraan.” Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 3, no. 2 (2022): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v3i2.81.

Susetyo, Heru. “Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Dalam Hukum Islam.” Misykat Al-Anwar Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Masyarakat 5, no. 2 (2022): 239. https://doi.org/10.24853/ma.5.2.239-260.

Yanggo, Huzaemah T. “Korupsi, Kolusi, Nepotisme Dan Suap Dalam Pandangan Hukum Islam.” Tahkim 9, no. 1 (2013): 1–20.

Yase, I Kadek Kartika. “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Pandangan Hindu.” Satya Dharma: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–23. https://ejournal.iahntp.ac.id/index.php/satya-dharma/article/view/508.