Praktek Excessive Pricing Dalam Bisnis Maskapai Penerbangan Ditinjau Dari Hukum Persaingan Usaha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v20i01.6408Keywords:
Excessive Pricing, Abuse of Dominant Position, Airline BusinessAbstract
This study aims to analyze the practice of excessive pricing on airlines as a form of abuse of a dominant position from the perspective of business competition law. The practice of excessive pricing is a strategy of setting excessive and exploitative prices toward consumers. In this research, The researcher indicated unfair business competition associated with excessive pricing practices. In addition, the researcher also analyzed the impact of excessive pricing practices on consumers and business competition. The research method used is normative research with a doctrinal research approach. The study results show that many users of air transportation modes make airline business actors take advantage of these conditions to multiply company profits by selling tickets at very high prices exceeding the Excessive Pricing. However, in Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, there is no explanation of whether excessive pricing practices abuse a dominant position or are just regular business activity. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze and simultaneously prove indications of unfair business competition by airline business actors through excessive pricing from the perspective of business competition law.
Downloads
References
Bima Adhi Bachtiar, 031311133205. “Indikasi Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Maskapai Penerbangan Domestik.” Skripsi, Universitas Airlangga, 2017. http://lib.unair.ac.id.
Citrawinda, Cita. Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing, 2021.
Danish Competition and Consumer Authority. “CD Pharma Has Abused Its Dominant Position by Increasing Their Price by 2,000 Percent.” DCCA, 2018. https://www.en.kfst.dk/nyheder/kfst/english/decisions/2018-cd-pharma-has-abused-its-dominant-position-by-increasing-their-price-by-2-000-percent/.
———. The Danish Competition Act (Consolidation Act No. 869 of 8 July 2015) (t.t.).
Gilo, David, dan Yossi Spiegel. “The Antitrust Prohibition of Excessive Pricing.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 61 (2018): 503–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.05.003.
Hasbullah, M. Afif. “Perdebatan Definisi Dan Kriteria Posisi Dominan Dalam Perspektif Regulasi Dan Ekonomi.” Syntax Literate : Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 6, no. 1 (2021).
I Made Pasek Diantha. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Kencana Media, 2016.
Indonesia National Air Carrier Association. “INACA Annual Report.” Indonesia National Air Carrier Association, 2021. https://inaca.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/INACA-Annual-Report-2021_OK.pdf.
Kagramanto, Lucianus Budi. Mengenal Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Berdasarkan UU No.5 Tahun 1999). Sidoarjo: Laros, 2015.
Margono, Suyud. Hukum Anti Monopoli. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2021.
“Maskapai Penerbangan Favorit Warga Indonesia, Siapa Juaranya? | Databoks.” Diakses 30 Juni 2023. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/01/16/maskapai-penerbangan-favorit-warga-indonesia-siapa-juaranya.
Menteri Negara Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia. “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.” Kementerian Negara Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia. Diakses 30 Juni 2023. https://www.kppu.go.id/docs/UU/UU_No.5.pdf.
Moechtar, Oemar. “Pasar Modern Pada Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 1 Tahun 2010 Dalam Aspek Hukum Persaingan.” Yuridika 26, no. 2 (2011).
Motta, Massimo, dan Alexandre de Streel. The Pros and Cons of High Prices. Stockholm: Swedish Competition Authority, 2007.
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dalam Teori Dan Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2012.
Pendi, Pepen. Kupas Tuntas Penerbangan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2016.
Rahayu, Retno Tri, dan Ria Setyawati. “The Juridical Approach in Indonesia Competition Law.” PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt 17, no. 5 (2020).
Reena Nair. “Measuring excessive pricing as an abuse of dominance – an assessment of the criteria used in the Harmony Gold/ Mittal Steel complaint.” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 11, no. 3 (2008).
Simbolon, Alum. “Pendekatan Yang Dilakukan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Menentukan Pelanggaran Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 20, no. 2 (2013).
Sudiarto. Pengantar Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Media, 2021.
Sukarmi, dan Hanif Nur Widhiyanti. Bayang-Bayang Kartel dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2022.
Tambunan, Toman Sony, dan Wilson R.G Tambunan. Hukum bisnis. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2019.
United Brands v Commissio Case No 27/1976 (t.t.).
