Publication Ethic

Statement of Ethics and Publication Malpractice
Tarbawiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, where other scientists (peer-reviewed) evaluate the value and credibility of articles before they are published. This journal is dedicated to publishing scientific articles in Educational Sciences, especially Islamic education from various aspects and perspectives as well as predetermined themes. The journal is available in print with ISSN: 2579-3241, and online ISSN: 2579-325X, and is published biannually, in June and December. In addition, Tarbawiyah Scientific Educational Journal aims to become a forum for ideas and results of research dissemination in the field of Islamic Education Sciences in Indonesia. Tarbawiyah Scientific Educational Journal can also be a significant reference in the same field. As such, Tarbawiyah Jurnal Scientific Pendidikan is committed to maintaining high ethical standards in scientific publications including peer-reviewed authors, journal editors, and publishers.
 
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in the Tarbawiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan is an important building block in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. The articles reviewed together to support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected of all parties involved in the publishing act: authors, editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public. As a publisher, Tarbawiyah Journal of Scientific Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training (FTIK), State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Metro Lampung, Indonesia, takes responsibility for all stages of publishing seriously and recognizes ethical and other responsibilities. The Tarbiyah and Teaching Science Faculty (FTIK) of the State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Metro Lampung, Indonesia, is committed to ensuring that advertisements, reprints, or other commercial revenue have no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
 
Publication Decision
The editor of Tarbawiyah, Scientific Educational Journal, is responsible for deciding which articles to submit to the journal to be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by the legal requirements that will apply regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors can confer with other editors or reviewers in making decisions.
 
Plagiarism Screening
Authors only need to submit a script that is free of academic plagiarism and malpractice. Editors, however, double-check each article before publication. The steps are (1) checking plagiarism against the offline database developed by FTIK IAIN Metro Lampung; (2) against as many online databases as possible.
 
Fair Play
An editor at all times evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.
 
Confidentiality
Editors and editorial staff may not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and publishers, as appropriate.
 
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Unpublished material disclosed in the submitted manuscript may not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.
 
Task Reviewers 
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Reviewers assist editors in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communication with authors can also assist writers in improving the quality of the manuscript.
 
Promptness
Any selected referee who feels ineligible to review the research reported in the manuscript or who knows that an in-person review is not possible should notify the editor and seek permission from the review process.
 
Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.
 
Standard of Objectivity
The review process must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
 
Source Recognition
Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the author. Any statement that the observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by an appropriate citation. The reviewer should also call the editor's attention about any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscripts being considered.