Publication Ethics

Journal policies on authorship and contributorship

The editors of the International Journal of Islamic Economics  are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. By submitting the consent to publish, authors aware and agree that no multiple submission, i.e. that the manuscript is under consideration or has been published elsewhere, is allowed. 

International Journal of Islamic Economics is also against plagiarism. The editors is guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding copyright infringement and plagiarism.

Journal policies on potential conflict of interest

International Journal of Islamic Economics  editorial boards have the task to ensures Fair play. By fair play means editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Editorial boards must also enact Confidentiality, i.e. the editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Editorial boards must also maintain principles of  Disclosure and no conflicts of interest, that unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Reviewer's Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Reviewers must also display the following ethics: Promptness, that any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Confidentiality, that any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Standards of Objectivity, that reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Acknowledgement of Sources, reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest, that privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

While duties of Authors must adhere to: Reporting standards, that authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Data Access and Retention, that authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication. Originality and Plagiarism, that the authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication, that an author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Acknowledgement of Sources, that proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Authorship of the Paper, that authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest, that all authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published works, that when an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Journal policies on data sharing and reproducibility

International Journal of Islamic Economics encourages authors to share the data and other artefacts supporting the results in the paper by archiving it in an appropriate public repository. Authors may provide a data availability statement, including a link to the repository they have used, in order that this statement can be published in their paper. Shared data should be cited.

Journal’s policy on ethical oversight

Editor-in Chief must maintain a good relationship with other editoral boards, reviewers, and authors in highly ethical academics standards of respect, objectivity, fairness, and transparency. All manuscripts must be submitted online via the journal system and adhere to journal's peer review and publication process. Therefore, the main consideration for publication/acceptance is solely based on the academic peer-review conducted by the selected reviewers. Editorial boards shall maintain this value as to uphold high professional editorial standards.

Journal’s policy on intellectual property

International Journal of Islamic Economics  editorial staff will have the access to check and filter manuscripts using checkers such as Turn it in, as a means to control redudancy and plagiarism. To pass, the rule of thumb for similarity check must be no more than 20%. This is done after the manuscript is submitted and before peer-review is conducted.

Journal's policy for complaint and appeals

Authors can address his/her complaints regarding rejections and editorial errors via email to Contacting Editorial boards privately may not be considered as official reports, thus International Journal of Islamic Economics  is not responsible for delayed/long handling.

Download Publication Ethics (Bahasa Indonesia)