Reformulating Progressive Fiqh of Talak (Divorce): A Contemporary Study of the Principle of Making Divorce More Difficult in SEMA No. 1 of 2022 for Women's Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i2.9950Keywords:
Divorce, Khulu', Progressive, SEMA, Women Protection.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the reformulation of progressive fiqh of Talak (divorce), with a focus on SEMA No. 1 of 2022, which emphasizes the principle of making divorce more difficult in the interest of protecting women. In the context of Islamic law, divorce has often been considered a unilateral right controlled by the husband, potentially neglecting the rights of women. SEMA No. 1 of 2022 was introduced as a response to this issue, offering a fairer and more just approach for all parties involved. This research employs a library research method, reviewing legal literature, official documents, as well as the views of legal scholars and practitioners regarding the implementation of this policy. The analysis results show that the reformulation of the fiqh of divorce in SEMA No. 1 of 2022 provides a better platform for protecting women's rights in divorce proceedings, including encouragement for mediation and peaceful dispute resolution. Furthermore, this study identifies challenges in the application of this principle on the ground, including cultural and social resistance. This research is expected to contribute to the development of family law in Indonesia that is more responsive to the needs of women, as well as to raise awareness of the importance of justice for all parties in the context of divorce. This study serves as an important reference for further research on fiqh of divorce and women's protection policies within the framework of contemporary Islamic law.
Downloads
References
`Abdillah, Ismail Musa Musthafa. Ahkam Al-Khul`i Fiy Al-Syari`ah Al-Islamiyah. Palestina: Jami`ah al-Najah al-Wathaniyah, 2008.
Abubakar, Ali, and Maulizawati Maulizawati. “Persyaratan Hak ‘Iwadh Khulu’ (Analisa Terhadap Pendapat Mazhab Maliki).” El-USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 1, no. 1 (2019): 19. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v1i1.5566.
Ahmidi. “Cerai Gugat Verstek Di Pengadilan Agama Surabaya Perspektif Mashlahah Daruriyah.” Berasan: Journal of Islamic Civil Law 3, no. 1 (2024): 77–93. http://202.162.210.182/index.php/berasan/article/view/9723/pdf.
Al-Bukhâriy, Abû `Abdullâh Muhammad bin Ismâ`il. Shahîh Al-Bukhâriy. Mesir: Al-Suthaniyah, 1311.
Al-Hilaliy, Taqiyuddin. Ahkam Al-Khul`iy Fiy Al-Islam. 2nd ed. Beirut: Al-Maktabah al-Islamiy, 1395.
Al-Nasâ’iy, Abu `Abdurrahmân Ahmad bin Syu`ayb. Sunan Al-Nasâ’iy. 1st ed. Kairo: Al-Maktabah al-Tijariyah al-Kubra, 1930.
Al-Zuhayliy, Wahbah bin Musthafa. Al-Fiqh Al-Islamiy Wa Adillatuh. Damaskus: Dâr al-Fikr, 1433.
Andrea, Fahmi Tiara Rahma, and Zakiah Nurul Awaliyah. “Fulfillment of The Rights of Wife and Children Post Divorce.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 1, no. 2 (2022): 231. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v1i2.6211.
Annisaa Shalsabila Miracle, Muhammad Agus Muljanto. “Efektivitas Kebijakan Program Puspaga Sebagai Unit Semolowaru Kota Surabaya.” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli (JSH) 7 (2024).
Aulia, Mohamad Faisal. “Analisis Perbandingan Penerapan Hukum Keluarga Di Mesir Dan Di Indonesia.” Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Peradilan Islam 2, no. 2 (2022): 123–32. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v2i2.14327.
Baharuddin, A. Zamakhsyari, and Rifqi Qowiyul Iman. “Kompetensi Peradilan Agama Menangani Perkara Cerai Gugat Dalam Tinjauan Fikih Islam.” Al-Mizan 16, no. 2 (2020): 201–24. https://doi.org/10.30603/am.v16i2.1875.
Darmawan, Darmawan, Suhaimi Suhaimi, Muhammad Natsir, T. Rasyidin, and Mustakim Mustakim. “Relative Competence of the Sharia Court: Talaq Divorce Lawsuit and Protection of Women’s Rights.” Samarah 7, no. 1 (2023): 84–100. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.16053.
Efrinaldi, Jayusman, Shafra, and Nurfatati. “Urf Review Of The Practice Of Gold Marriage Mahar In The Community Of Tanjung Senang District Bandar Lampung.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2022): 287–310. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4085.
Fajriyanti, Qisthy, Diana Farid, Muhammad Husni Adulah Pakarti, Aceng Hobir, and Moh Imron Taufik. “Khulu’ Sebuah Upaya Memutuskan Ikatan Perkawinan (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Agama Garut).” Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 15, no. 2 (2023): 343. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v15i2.9570.
Hermawan, Faza Pauzia, and Tajul Arifin. “Khulu: Tinjauan Menurut Hadits Bukhori Dan Pasal 148 KHI.” Al Fuadiy : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 6, no. 1 (2024): 42–58. https://doi.org/10.55606/af.v6i1.912.
Hidayat, Taufiq, Rahmatulloh Panji Maulana, and Panji Maulana. “Kedudukan Iwad Terhadap Keabsahan Khuluk ( Studi Komparatif Pendapat Imam Malik Dan Imam Syafi ’ i )" Usrotuna 5, no. 2 (n.d.): 42–64.
Ibn Hajar al-Haytamiy, Ahmad bin Muhammad bin `Aliy. Tuhfah Al-Muhtaj Fiy Syarh Al-Minhaj. Mesir: Al-Maktabah al-Tijariyah al-Kubra, 1983.
Ibrahim, A. R., and Nasrullah. “Eksistensi Hak Ex Officio Hakim Dalam Perkara Cerai Talak.” Samarah 1, no. 2 (2017): 459–78. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v1i2.2378.
Ilba, Hanafi, and Ibnu Radwan Siddik Turnip. “Masa Enam Bulan Berpisah Tempat Tinggal Sebagai Syarat Formil Pengajuan Perceraian Dengan Alasan Pertengkaran: Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 421 K/Ag/2023).” As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 6, no. 2 (2024): 1738–54. https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v6i2.6589.
Kusmidi, Henderi. “Khulu’ (Talak Tebus) Dan Implikasi Hukumnya Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” EL-AFKAR : Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Tafsir Hadis 7, no. 1 (2018): 37. https://doi.org/10.29300/jpkth.v7i1.1586.
Lathifah, Amalia. “Interpretation of Verses on Women in Politics.” MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review 2, no. 1 (2023): 10–26. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i1.6872.
Rihdo, Maulana, Ishaq Maulana Sudur, Ahsandy Ramadhan Suardi, Satriya Pamungkas, and Fauziyah Putri Meilinda. “Kedudukan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (Sema) Dalam Perspektif Akademisi: Kekuatan Hukum, Ketetapan Dan Konsistensi, Pengaruh Terhadap Putusan Hukum.” Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 4, no. 2 (2023): 230–40. https://doi.org/10.46773/usrah.v4i2.791.
Rkt, Yunus, U I N Syekh, Ali Hasan, Ahmad Addary, Indonesia Email, Abstrak Penelitian, Kota Padangsidimpuan, et al. “Perceraian Di Luar Pengadilan : Menelisik Tanggungjawab Suami Dalam Keluarga” 11, no. 3 (2024): 311–20.
Rochadi, Daffanza Azriel, and Sulastri Sulastri. “Pembatalan Perkawinan Yang Perkawinannya Telah Putus Akibat Kematian Dalam Keadaan Poligami Tidak Tercatat.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 17, no. 6 (2023): 4157. https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v17i6.2860.
Shesa, Laras. “Keterjaminan Kedudukan Dzaul Arham Dalam Kewarisan Islam Melalui Wasiat Wajibah.” Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (2018): 145. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v3i2.615.
Situmorang, Fernando, Ramlani Lina, and Sinaulan Mohamad. “Kajian Hukum Tentang Kedudukan SEMA No. 2 Tahun 2022 Atas Undang-Undang Kepailitan Nomor 37 Tahun 2004.” Jurnal Studi Interdisipliner Perspektif 22, no. 2 (2022): 117–27.
Yulmina, Rusydi Ali Muhammad. “Multi Alasan Cerai Gugat: Tinjauan Fikih Terhadap Cerai Gugat Perkara Nomor:0138/Pdt.G/2015/MS.Bna Pada Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2019): 32–51.
Zainuddin, Khairina, and Sulastri Caniago. “Itsbat Talak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia.” Al-Ahwal 12, no. 1 (2019): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2019.12103.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laras Shesa, Muhammad Abu Dzar, Elkhairati, Henny Septia Utami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
