The Problem of the Jakarta High Court Decision Number 10 /Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/pt DKI Against Dr. Pinangki Sirna Malasari, S. H., M. H

Authors

  • Nur Rahmah UIN Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i1.6930

Keywords:

Pinangki, Judge's Verdict, Corruption

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime, and efforts to eradicate it must be taken seriously. In deciding corruption cases, judges must consider the consequences of the defendant's actions. Judges can decide cases, but this freedom is not absolute; the community must consider it. Thus, judges cannot act arbitrarily in deciding cases. Decree Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT DKI regarding corruption cases committed by the Pinangki Prosecutor's Office has juridical considerations regarding the gender of the accused, which is used as one of the reasons for the reduction. The duration of detention is from  10 to 4 years. Therefore, many parties consider the consideration and consideration of Decision Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT DKI is wrong. This study aims to analyze the validity of judges' decisions based on criminal liability and the validity of judges' rulings and court decisions. The results of this study show that the judge's consideration and verdict against the Pinangki Public Prosecutor are unreasonable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2019/08/25/penelitian-hukum-normatif-dan-penelitian-hukum-yurudis/ 07/11/2022
https://cekhukum.com/pasal-183-kuhap-kitab-undang-undang-hukum-acara-pidana/ Retrieved 17/12/2022
https://yuridis.id/pasal-197-kuhap-kitab-undang-undang-hukum-acara-pidana/ Retrieved 17/12/2022
Report on the Results of Public Examination of Decision Number 10/PID. SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI Defendant Pinangki Sirna Malasari
Nomi, Ade Nomi. 2021 "Mitigating Matters of the Corruption Court Decision at the Jakarta High Court on behalf of Dr. Pinangki Sirna Malasari, Sh., Mh. (Decision Number: 10/Pid.Tpk/2021/PT Dki), Article, Pamulang University
Article 183 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
Groupthink
DKI Jakarta High Court, Agumg Court Decision, Number 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT DKI Jakarta. 2021
DKI Jakarta High Court, Agumg Court Decision, Number 38/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN DKI Jakarta. 2021
Regulation of the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia Number Per-014/A/Ja/11/2012 concerning the Code of Conduct of the Attorney General
Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Women's Cases with Law
Permanasari, Noviana Permanasari. 2021. "Basic Analysis of Legal Considerations by Central Jakarta High Court Judge No. 10/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PT Dki", Syntax Idea, Vol. 3, No. 9.
Senok, Azalya Kyla Saffanah. "Juridical Analysis of Corruption Crimes Committed by Pinangki Prosecutors," Journal of Legal Science Research, Vol 2 Number 1,
Sonata, Depri Liber. 2014."Normative and Empirical Legal Research Methods: Distinctive Characteristics of Legal Research Methods," Journal of Legal Sciences, Vol 8 No.1
Wahyuni, Fitri. 2017."Fundamentals of Criminal Law in Indonesia", (South Tangerang: PT Nusantara Persada Utama

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

The Problem of the Jakarta High Court Decision Number 10 /Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/pt DKI Against Dr. Pinangki Sirna Malasari, S. H., M. H. (2023). MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review, 2(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i1.6930