Prohibition of Friday Prayer During COVID-19 Pandemic Period Againts Red Zone Areas in Islamic Law Perspective

Authors

  • Muhammad Fahrudin Nur Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malam
  • Anna Berliana Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malam
  • Evi Yuliana Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malam
  • Mawad Datul Mukaromah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malam
  • Aadil Ahmad Shairgojri PhD Scholarships in India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v1i1.6190

Keywords:

Covid-19, Friday Prayer, Islamic Law, Red Zone

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, the Indonesian government prohibited people from performing Friday prayers in mosques based on the MUI fatwa. Based on these problems, this research wants to see whether some people obey the regulations or continue to perform Friday prayers because they think that Friday prayers are obligatory. Then we will look for the law on not performing Friday prayers because of a dangerous disease outbreak. There will be an equation of original law with maslahah murlah based on a review of Islamic legal philosophy. The law on Friday prayers is fardlu 'ain for men if the obligatory conditions are met. Friday prayer is the obligatory prayer of two rak'ahs which is carried out in congregation at Zuhr time, preceded by two sermons. The Covid-19 outbreak is not only a national problem in a country, but is also a global problem. In anticipating and reducing the number of corona virus sufferers in Indonesia, measures have been taken, including providing a policy of limiting activities outside the house. In Indonesia, the MUI urges Muslims to temporarily replace Friday prayers with midday prayers at home in the Covid 19 emergency situation to avoid a mudhorot, namely contracting an epidemic.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-26

How to Cite

Prohibition of Friday Prayer During COVID-19 Pandemic Period Againts Red Zone Areas in Islamic Law Perspective. (2022). MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 1(1), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v1i1.6190