Contemporary Islamic Economic Law: Autonomous Smart Contracts and the Legal Dilemma of Liability for Technical Errors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13661Keywords:
Islamic Economic Law; Smart Contracts; Sharia Compliance; Technical Liability.Abstract
Contemporary Islamic economic law faces emerging challenges arising from the rapid development of autonomous smart contracts and blockchain-based automated contracting systems. This study examines the legal and Islamic jurisprudential implications of autonomous smart contracts and the allocation of liability for technical errors in digitally executed agreements. It aims to analyze the validity of automated contracting under contemporary Islamic economic law and comparative legal frameworks, particularly in relation to blockchain-based systems and electronic agents. Using a doctrinal legal research methodology, the study applies descriptive, analytical, and comparative approaches, drawing on statutory provisions, international conventions, and principles of Islamic jurisprudence, including liability (ḍamān), causation (sababiyyah), and risk-bearing (al-ghurm bi al-ghunm). The findings indicate that autonomous smart contracts are generally valid under both positive law and Sharia when they reflect prior human consent encoded in automated systems and comply with the requirements of clarity, legality, and the absence of excessive uncertainty. However, significant legal uncertainty persists regarding liability for technical errors, system malfunctions, and programming defects occurring during automated execution. The study concludes that responsibility is primarily attributed to the owner or operator of the automated system, as supported by comparative legal doctrines treating electronic agents as instruments of the contracting party and by Islamic principles linking profit with liability. Accordingly, the research contributes to bridging classical Islamic legal theory and modern digital contracting environments while highlighting the need for clearer regulatory frameworks to address emerging technological risks.
References
Abdellaoui, Mourad. 'The Legitimacy and Procedure of Electronic Contracts in Islamic Jurisprudence and Algerian Legislation'. The International Tax Journal 51, no. 6 (2024): 309–317.
Abu-Hashima, A. Electronic Information Service Contracts in Private International Law. Dar Al-Nahda publication., 2004.
Ahmad, Azlin Alisa, Mat Noor Mat Zain, and Nur Diyana Amanina Zakaria. 'The Position of Smart Contracts in the Light of Islamic Contract Theory'. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2024): 144–171. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.16372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.16372
Al Noaimi, Alaa Yaqoob. 'The Electronic Agent: Its Concept and Legal Nature'. University of Sharjah Journal for Sharia and Legal Sciences 7, no. 2 (2010): 149–192.
Alaloosh, Mahmood, Govar Majed Ahmad, and Lara Adel Jabbar. 'Adapting Iraqi Law to Smart Contracts: A Comparative Analysis Incorporating Islamic Law Principles and Consumer Protection in the Contemporary Digital Era'. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 5, no. 1 (2026): 210–246. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13031
Alaloosh, Mahmood, Ali Shaker Mahmood, and Sabir Hussien Eliwy. 'Securing Digital Trade: A Techno-Legal Analysis of E-Commerce Safeguards in Iraq's Regulation No. 4/2025'. Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 5, no. 1 (2026): 44–60. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18452737.
Al-Buqami, Aidh bin Sultan. 'Electronic Commerce in the Saudi Legal System: A Comparative Study'. Dar Al-Ijada, 2017. https://daralejadh.com/dyldWr.
Al-Dhnoon, Hassan Ali. Al-Mabsoot in Civil Liability. House of Wael Publication, 2021.
Al-Saad, Walid. The Legal System of the Electronic Agent. Al-Halabi Legal Publications, 2017. https://www.neelwafurat.com/itempage.aspx?id=lbb262177-245561&search=books.
Al-Tuwayni, A. Kulthum Haji. 'The Basis of Civil Liability in Islamic Jurisprudence'. almarifa journal for Humanities and Applied Sciences 1, no. 5 (2025): 21–45.
'Article 11 of UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Appointment of Arbitrators'. IBC Laws, n.d. Accessed 26 April 2026. https://ibclaw.in/article-11-of-uncitral-model-law-on-international-commercial-arbitration-appointment-of-arbitrators/.
Arum, Indiharwati, Mailah Mailah, and Binti Mohamad Nor Asiah. 'Gharar in Shafi'i Jurisprudence: Reassessing Its Validity in E-Commerce Transactions'. Al-Iktisab: Journal of Islamic Economic Law, 2025.
Atiyah, Ghassan Adhab, Nazura Abdul Manap, Ahmed Ismael Ibrahim, and Abdur Rahman. 'Legitimacy of Smart Contracts from the Perspective of Islamic Law: A Case Study of Blockchain Transactions'. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2024): 155–192. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i1.8726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i1.8726
Bartoletti, Massimo, and Livio Pompianu. 'An Empirical Analysis of Smart Contracts: Platforms, Applications, and Design Patterns'. arXiv.Org, 18 March 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0_31
Cebola, Cátia Marques, and Susana Sardinha Monteiro. 'New Trends of Digital Justice: The Online Mediation—Between a Challenge and a Reality (The Portuguese Legal Framework)'. Laws 13, no. 2 (2024): 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13020018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13020018
Elobaid, Ali Hadi. 'Attribution Rules of the Electronic Message to the Creator in the UAE E-Commerce and Transactions Law'. UAEU Law Journal, 2013.
European Directive No. 31-2000.
Fry, Patricia Brumfield, Stephen Y. Chow, Kenneth W. Elliott, and Henry Deeb Gabriel. Uniform Electronic Transactions ACT. 1999.
Ghannam, Sharif Muhammad. The Bank Is Responsible for Computer Errors in the Electronic Transfer of Money. New University Publisher, 2006.
Gunawan, Yordan, Muhammad Praditya Dananjaya, Setiyantoro Wahyu Aditama, and Muhammad Daffa Auliarizky Onielda. 'Indonesian Sea Sand Exports: UNCLOS Compliance v. Environmental Sustainability Dilemma Explored'. Jurnal Hukum 41, no. 2 (2025): 394–410. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i2.32294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v41i2.32294
Hamid, E. Electronic Agent. Raya Higher Institute of Management and Foreign Trade, 2020.
Jabbara, Noura. 'Contracting through the Electronic Agent'. Al-Shamela Journal of Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (2021): 136–144.
Jarrah, Baker Akram Falah, Zeyad AlMatarneh, Nehad Ibrahim Ineizeh, Haneen Aqel Al-Khawaja, and Emran Abdulsalam AlZubi. The Relationship Between the Accounting Information System and Perceived Performance: The Moderating Effect of Managerial Qualifications According to Company Law," Quality. 2025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/26.208.07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/26.208.07
Juraidan, Nayef bin Jamaan. 'Guarantee of Damage Resulted from Conclusion of the Contract by Electronic Agent: A Comparative and Rooting Study'. Journal of the Faculty of Sharia and Law, 2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21608/JFSLT.2020.105692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jfslt.2020.105692
M, Ibrahim. E-Commerce Contracts under the UAE Federal Law. Dar Al-Fikir publication, 2020.
Masadeh, Ahmad Mahmoud Al, Malek Hamad Abunaseir, and Rami Omar Abu Rukba. 'Impact of Jordanian Electronic Transactions Law and Digital Transformation on Commercial Contracts and Their Proof'. Journal of Human Security 20, no. 1 (2024): 104–108.
Mashhour, Omar Farouk Al, Ahmad Shamsul Abd Aziz, and Nor Azlina Mohd Noor. 'Legal and Regulatory Aspects of Smart Contracts: A Systematic Review'. Eurasian Journal of Management & Social Sciences - Open Access 4, no. 2 (2023): 156–172. https://doi.org/10.23918/ejmss.V4i2p156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23918/ejmss.V4i2p156
Matondang, Hafidz Ramadhan Noor, Intan Geandra, and Abdul Rahman Sofyan. ‘Prinsip Non-Harm Sebagai Kerangka Etis Pengelolaan Sengketa Bisnis Syariah Di Era Digital’. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam (JEBI) 6, no. 1 (2026): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.56013/jebi.v6i1.5254.
Mohamad Ghazali, Nasrun, Mohd Fuad Md. Sawari, Bouhedda Ghalia, and Syed Musa Syed Jaafar Alhabshi. 'The Fiqh Maxim Al-Ghunm Bi al-Ghurm: A Critique on Interpretation of the Maxim Relating to the Risk-Return Concept in Islamic Banking and Finance'. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance 16, no. 2 (2024): 4–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55188/ijif.v16i2.412
Nicholas, Imparato. Public Policy and the Internet: Privacy, Taxes, and Contract. Hoover Institution Press, 2010. Reprint, 2010.
Riani, Riris Mesta, Lisnawati Utami, and Maulida Rahma Layyin Syifa. 'The Implementation of Smart Contracts and Blockchain-Based Smart Sukuk in Islamic Finance: A Sharia Economic Law Perspective'. Proceeding International Conference on Islam, Law, and Society (INCOILS) 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.70062/incoils.v2i1.488.
Saadi, Mohamed. Al-Nazariyah al-ʿAmmah Lil-Iltizamat: Dirasah Muqaranah [The General Theory of Obligations: A Comparative Study]. Dar Al-Maʿarif, 2023.
Saifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad, Sonia Ivana Barus, Novendri M. Nggilu, Asrul Ibrahim Nur, and Dindha Shahrazade Sulaiman. 'Political Dynasties in General Elections According to Human Rights and A Comparison in Four ASEAN Countries'. Trunojoyo Law Review 7, no. 1 (2025): 123–160. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v7i1.28492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v7i1.28492
Semida, Salah Eldin Ragab, Zeyad Tareq Al-Rawe, Sarmad Dalaf Hanoosh, Tarek El-Sayed Mahmoud Abu Aqil, and Mahmood Shaker Alaloosh. 'From Remedial to Preventive Justice: A Contemporary Reframing of Civil Liability in Islamic and Comparative Law'. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 5, no. 1 (2026): 722–752. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13126
Tantawi, Shadi Ramadan Ibrahim. The Legal Framework of Contracting and Signature in E-Commerce. 1st ed. Arab Center for Publishing and Distribution, 2016.
The Saudi Electronic Transactions Law, Pub. L. No. No. M/18 (2007). 2007.
UETA, 1999, Comment. No. 1, § Section 14. 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-3664(91)90077-E
UETA, 1999, Section 14.
UETA, Section 6, 1999.
UN Convention, Article 12, 2005.
UN Convention,2005, § Article 14/ 1. 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1773-035X(05)80137-6
Uniform Electronic Transactions ACT (1999), Section 2.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. 'UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce (1996) with Additional Article 5 Bis as Adopted in 1998'. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Accessed 28 April 2026. https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/ecommerce/modellaw/electronic_commerce.
Uula, Mimma Maripatul. Smart Contracts and the Islamic Finance Industry | Journal of Islamic Economics Literatures. n.d. Accessed 26 May 2026. https://journals.smartinsight.id/index.php/JIEL/article/view/631?utm_source=chatgpt.com. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58968/jiel.v6i1.631
Wardani, Retno Endah Kusuma. 'The Implementation of Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts in Islamic Finance: Opportunities and Challenges'. Dalwa Islamic Economic Studies: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah 4, no. 2 (2025): 130–152. https://doi.org/10.38073/dies.v4i2.3760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38073/dies.v4i2.3760
Wright, Benjamin, and Jane K. Winn. 'The Law of Electronic Commerce'. Berkeley Law, Aspen Law & Business, 1998. https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/496606.
Zheng, Zibin, Shaoan Xie, Hong-Ning Dai, et al. 'An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms'. arXiv.Org, 22 December 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.12.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.12.019
Zulkarnaen, Wandy. 'Shariah in the Age of Blockchain: Rethinking Legal Authority and Smart Contracts in Decentralized Islamic Finance'. Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law and Studies 1, no. 1 (2025): 56–68. https://doi.org/10.47353/jcils.v1i1.371.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sabir M. Al-Meze, Samir M. Al-Dalalah, Nabeel F. Al-Shatnawi, Mohammad F. Matalkaha, Abd Alhade Mossa Hasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






