From Remedial to Preventive Justice: A Contemporary Reframing of Civil Liability in Islamic and Comparative Law

Salah Eldin Ragab Semida; Zeyad Tareq Al-Rawe; Sarmad Dalaf Hanoosh; Tarek El-Sayed Mahmoud Abu Aqil; Mahmood Shaker Alaloosh

doi:10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13126

Authors

Salah Eldin Ragab Semida College of Law, University of Al Maarif, Iraq
Zeyad Tareq Al-Rawe College of Law Sohar University, Oman
Sarmad Dalaf Hanoosh College of Law, University of Al Maarif, Iraq
Tarek El-Sayed Mahmoud Abu Aqil College of Law, University of Al Maarif, Iraq
Mahmood Shaker Alaloosh College of Administration and Economics., University of Kirkuk, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13126

Keywords:

Islamic Jurisprudence; Preventive Civil Liability; Precautionary Principle; Risk Regulation.

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of civil liability from its traditional compensatory function toward a preventive model capable of addressing contemporary technological, environmental, and industrial risks. The research aims to analyze the legal foundations of the preventive function of civil liability, identify gaps in modern legislation, particularly in Arab jurisdictions, and explore how principles derived from Islamic jurisprudence can enhance contemporary legal frameworks. The study adopts a descriptive and comparative analytical methodology, examining statutory provisions, judicial rulings, and doctrinal writings in selected legal systems, including French, Chinese, and Indonesian law, alongside Islamic juristic maxims grounded in uṣūl al-fiqh, particularly the principles of lā ḍarar wa lā ḍirār and sadd al-dharāʾiʿ. The findings reveal that modern legal systems increasingly recognize preventive liability through mechanisms such as judicial injunctions, the duty of care, elimination-of-danger actions, and public interest litigation. However, these mechanisms vary in scope and philosophical foundation, and many Arab civil codes lack explicit and coherent preventive provisions. In contrast, Islamic jurisprudence offers a deeply rooted preventive framework that prioritizes averting harm over compensating for it, grounding liability in ethical responsibility and risk avoidance rather than solely in actual damage. The study concludes that integrating preventive principles into civil liability is both a legal and ethical necessity in the era of complex risks. It proposes a forward-looking legislative framework combining comparative legal techniques with Islamic preventive maxims to strengthen risk management and judicial intervention. Academically, the research contributes a novel comparative model that bridges Islamic jurisprudence and contemporary civil law theory, reconceptualizing liability as a proactive instrument of preventive justice rather than a merely remedial mechanism.

References

Abd al‑ʿAzīz ibn ʿAbd al‑Salām, Izz al‑Dīn. Qawāʿid al‑Aḥkām fī Maṣāliḥ al‑Anām [The Rules of Legal Rulings in the Public Interests]. Edited by Taha ʿAbd al‑Raʾūf Saʿd. Cairo: Maktabat al‑Kulliyyāt al‑Azharīyah. Dār al‑Maʿārif, 1414.

Abouyounes, Mohamed. ‘The Legal Underpinnings of Jordanian and Iraqi Law’s Administrative Penalty Systems’. Al-Biruni Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2 September 2025, 1. https://doi.org/10.64440/BIRUNI/BIR003.

Alawa, Abdelhaq. ‘The Status and Role of the Concept of Fault in Civil Liability’. Journal of Human Sciences (University of Oum El Bouaghi) 8, no. 2 (2021): 185–198.

Al-Borno, Mohammed Sadaqi. Al-Wajeez Fi Idhāh Qawāʿid al-Fiqh al-Kulliya [The Concise Explanation of the General Rules of Fiqh]. 4th ed. Al-Risālah al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1996. https://shamela.ws/book/8379.

al‑Ḥanbali, Ibn Rajab. Al-Qawāʿid, Rule: Al-Mubāsharah wa al-Tasabbub [Direct Action and Causation]. n.d.

Al‑Māwardī, Abū al‑Ḥasan. Al‑Aḥkām al‑Sulṭāniyyah Wa al‑Wilāyāt ad‑Dīniyyah [The Ordinances of Government and the Religious Authorities]. Dār al‑Kutub al‑ʿIlmiyyah, n.d. Accessed 19 February 2026. https://shamela.ws/book/22881.

Al-Omari, Ahmed Hisham Fawaz. ‘Civil Liability for Cybersecurity Violations: A Comparative Study between Egyptian Law and Jordanian Law’. Journal of Legal and Economic Research (Mansoura)., ahead of print, 1 September 2025. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjle.2025.460352.

Al-Zawahreh, Mohammad Muslim, and Kawakeb Abu Risha. ‘Civil Liability for Environmental Pollution Damages in Light of Modern Pollution Monitoring Technologies’. In Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Innovation Management and Risk Management. Springer, Cham, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95310-1_32.

Askeland, Bjarte, Keizô Yamamoto, Ken Oliphant, et al. Basic Questions of Tort Law from a Comparative Perspective. Jan Sramek Verlag, 2015. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_574832.

Az zahra,et al, Caelsea Asalyandira. ‘Unlawful Act (Tort) as an Instrument for the Protection of Private Civil Rights and Individual Human Rights: A Comparative Analysis between Indonesia and Germany’. International Journal Of Humanities Education And Social Sciences 5, no. 3 (2025): 1511–1520.

Batikh, Maha Ramadan. ‘The Effect of the Precautionary Principle on Civil Law Rules: Toward Moving Civil Liability from Compensation to Prevention’. Al‑Qanuni Journal 17, no. 8 (2023): 2355–2460. https://doi.org/10.21608/jlaw.2023.313319.

‘Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China’. Accessed 21 February 2026. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/lawsregulations/202012/31/content_WS5fedad98c6d0f72576943005.html.

Costa Moreira, R., Martins, and G. Wedy. ‘Environmental Civil Liability. In: Brazilian Environmental and Climate Change Law’. Springer, Cham, 2025. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87998-2_9.

Costache, Mirela. ‘The Analysis of the Functions of Civil Liability. Constants and New Valences’. EIRP Proceedings 11, no. 1 (2016). https://proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1767.

Da, Conca S. ‘Bridging the Liability Gap Using Human-Centered Legal Design: Three Scenarios to Apply the Liability from Social Contact.Pap’. Research and Innovation, Er presented at the 2020 WeRobot conference, 2020. https://www.uottawa.ca/research-innovation/centre-law-technology-society/werobot/papers.

Darmawan, Joko Budi, Fendy Suhariadi, Suparto Widjojo, Mia Amiati, and Amjad Hamad Abdullah. ‘Incorporating Islah Principles into Restorative Justice: Bridging Contemporary Legal Practice and Islamic Values’. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (2025): 269–294. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10435.

Dawood, Ibrahim Abdul Aziz. ‘The Danger of Legal Insecurity and the Necessity of Activating the Legislative Role: A Comparative Analytical Study’. Special Issue for the Conference ‘Law in the Face of Global Crises - Means and Challenges,’ College of Law, Qatar University 10, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.29117/irl.2021.0188.

Dillbary, J. Shahar, Cherie Metcalf, and Brock Stoddard. Incentivized Torts: An Empirical Analysis. n.d. Accessed 18 February 2026. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr/vol115/iss5/2.

El Babidi, Siham. ‘The Precautionary Principle in Civil Liability: A Contribution to the Development of Traditional Rules’. FUTURE GLOBALIST. Accessed 18 February 2026. https://www.future-globalist.org/siham-el-babidi.

Fernando, Zico Junius, Annisa Sabilla Sueni, Firdaus Arifin, Susi Ramadhani, and Almira Novia Zulaika. ‘Reconstructing Environmental Criminal Law in Indonesia Through a Comparative Zemiological Legal Study’. Trunojoyo Law Review 8, no. 1 (2026): 95–126. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v8i1.31912.

Flume, Johannes W. ‘Strict Liability in Austrian and German Law’. Journal of European Tort Law, 2021. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Strict-Liability-in-Austrian-and-German-Law-Flume/d28ed143b67e4900e8ddfc720bc21ff75f161b8e.

François, Terré, Simler Philippe, Lequette Yves, and Chénedé François. Les obligations. 12e éd., 2019. Précis. Dalloz, 2018.

G. Viney, La responsabilité conditions,. 1982. https://www.persee.fr/doc/ridc_0035-3337_1982_num_34_4_4019.

Giliker, Paula. ‘Is There a Duty to Prevent Harm in Tort? A Common Law Perspective’. Journal of European Tort Law 12, no. 1 (2021): 116–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2021-0007.

‘Hadith 32, 40 Hadith an-Nawawi - Forty Hadith of an-Nawawi - Sunnah.’ Accessed 20 February 2026. https://sunnah.com/nawawi40:32.

Haider, Aftab, Naim Mathlouthi, Mahmud Zuhdi Mohd Nor, Musda Asmara, Asif Khan, and Ramadhita. ‘From Stewardship to Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Ecological Jurisprudence and Western Anthropocentric Regimes’. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 25, no. 1 (2026): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v25i1.16040.

Hariyanto, Hariyanto, Muhammad Saleh Tajuddin, Zulhilmi Bin Paidi, Hajar Salamah Salsabila Hariz, and Mamluatur Rahmah. ‘Eco-Governance Fiqh and Urban Waste Management: A Critical Study of Environmental Policy in Yogyakarta’. Journal of Islamic Law 7, no. 1 (2026): 247–274. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v7i1.5167.

Hasan, Fenk. ‘National Belonging and Its Relationship with Psychological Security Among University Students’. Al-Biruni Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 15 January 2026, 1. https://doi.org/10.64440/BIRUNI/BIR0012.

Hidayati, Nunuk, Rusli Rusli, Moh Khusen, Asmawi Asmawi, and Sofyan Effendi. ‘Beyond Religious Bureaucracy: Sapta Darma’s Marriage Registration Struggle in Post-Constitutional Reform Indonesia’. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 25, no. 2 (2025): 305–334. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i2.305-334.

Ibrahim, Mohamed Tarek. ‘Civil Liability Insurance for the Risks of Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study’. Part 2. Damietta Journal of Legal and Economic Studies 12, no. 12 (2025): 743–787. https://doi.org/10.21608/mhdl.2025.375577.1169.

Khamim, Khamim, Moch Choirul Rizal, and Andi Ardiyan Mustakim. ‘Convergence of Restorative Justice and Al-‘Afwu: Reforming Criminal Procedure Law in Indonesia’. Justicia Islamica 22, no. 2 (2025): 277–302. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v22i2.9807.

‘Kitāb Al-Ashbāh Wa-al-Naẓāʼir : Manuscript, [1675], by Zayn al-Dīn Ibn Ibrāhīm Ibn Nujaym et al. | The Online Books Page’. Accessed 20 February 2026. https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=ha002641714.

L, Tichý. ‘Preventive Liability and System of Sanctions in Tort Law’. In Law of Remedies: A European Perspective. Intersentia, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780689449.009.

Lamia, Hamdado. ‘The Precautionary Principle as a New Dimension of Civil Liability: From Compensation to Prevention’. Al-Fikr Journal for Legal and Political Studies 2, no. 1 (2019): 289–319.

Landot, Eric. ‘A Quelle Date Appréhende-t-on Le Principe de Précaution’. 13 January 2025. https://blog.landot-avocats.net/2025/01/13/a-quelle-date-apprehende-t-on-le-principe-de-precaution-video-et-article/.

Leheza, Yevhen, Oleksandr Kurakin, Olha Shapovalova, Kateryna Sokh, and Artur Makarov. ‘Interpretation of Regulatory and Legal Acts in Contemporary Contexts: Foreign Experience, Comparative Perspectives, and Pathways for Regulatory Reform’. Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 5, no. 1 (2026): 102–122. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18727992.

Li Shaohua and Xiao Peng. ‘The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China: Major Features and Contributions to the World’. US-China Law Review 17, no. 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2020.08.001.

M. Lori, Kenneth, Melinda R. Jane, Andrew L. George, and Dennis H. Norts. ‘Technological Advancement and the Decline of Religiosity: A Sociological Analysis of the History of Religions and Their Future in the Twenty-First Century’. Al-Biruni Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 21 April 2026, 44. https://doi.org/10.64440/BIRUNI/BIR0023.

Marie-Anne Frison-Roche. ‘Arrêt Du 13 Février 1930, Jand’heur’. Accessed 19 February 2026. https://mafr.fr/fr/article/cour-de-cassation-chambres-reunies/.

Marnelly, T. Romi, Resdati Resdati, Dian Kurnia Anggreta, Defri Yoza, and Seger Sugiyanto. ‘Customary Law as Living Law in Environmental Forest Governance: A Sociology of Law Perspective on Legal Pluralism’. Jurnal Hukum 42, no. 2 (2026): 333–360. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v42i2.46995.

Moazzi, Jihad. ‘The Functional Development of Tort Civil Liability: Toward Strengthening the Preventive Function in Light of New Approaches’. Journal of Legal and Political Thought (Algeria) 5, no. 3 (2021): 322–343.

Murad, Dalal Tafkir, and Raghad Abd Muslim Ubaid. ‘“The Role of Civil Liability in Limiting Cyberattacks: A Comparative Study,”’. Al-Nahrain Journal of Legal Sciences 27, no. 3 (2025): 338.

N, Eskafi, Shahsavandi E, and Bozorgmehr A. A. ‘‪Preventive Civil Liability in Administrative Actions, Comparative Study of Iranian and English Law‬’. The Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law, 2024.‬

Nikolinakos, Nikos Th. ‘Reforming the EU Civil Liability Framework Applicable to Artificial Intelligence and Other Emerging Digital Technologies: The Proposed AI Liability Directive’. In Adapting the EU Civil Liability Regime to the Digital Age: Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Other Emerging Technologies. Springer, Cham, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67969-8_8.

Planiol, Marcel. Traité Élémentaire de Droit Civil : Conforme Au Programme Officiel Des Facultés de Droit. Tome 2 / Par Marcel Planiol,... 1931. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1159982j.

P.M, Marzuki. Pengantar Limu Hukum (Introduction to Jurisprudence. Kencana, Jakarta, 2021.

R, Cabrillac. Droit Des Obligations (15e Édition). Dalloz, 2021. https://www.librairie-aufildesmots.com/livre/9782247216499-droit-des-obligations-15e-edition-remy-cabrillac/.

Rakhmat, Muhamad. ‘Construction of Law Enforcement Against Money Laundering Crime with Cyber Laundering Mode’. Open Journal for Legal Studies 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–86.

Ramadan, Allam Khalifa. ‘Obstacles to Civil Liability for Damage to Waqf Property in Islamic Jurisprudence’. Damietta Journal of Legal and Economic Studies, Faculty of Law 11, no. 11 (2025): 1555-1630. https://doi.org/10.21608/MHDL.2025.306495.1112.

Riady, Roy, Febrian Febrian, Nashriana Nashriana, and M. Yusuf. ‘Reformulating the Reversal of the Burden of Proof in Corruption Cases: Integrating Positive Law and Islamic Legal Principles’. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 25, no. 2 (2025): 514–528. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i2.30483.

Saadi, Mohamed. Al-Nazariyah al-ʿAmmah Lil-Iltizamat: Dirasah Muqaranah [The General Theory of Obligations: A Comparative Study]. Dar Al-Maʿarif, 2023.

Shubayr, Muhammad ʿUthmān. Al‑Qawāʿid al‑Kullīyah wa‑al‑Ḍawābiṭ al‑Fiqhīyah Fī al‑Sharīʿah al‑Islāmīyah [The Universal Principles and Jurisprudential Rules in Islamic Law]. 2nd edn. Dār al‑Nafāʾis, 2007.

SifatuSafwa. ‘I’laam al-Mouwaqi’in ’an Rabb Il-’Alamin - Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziya’. Accessed 20 February 2026. https://www.sifatusafwa.com/en/usool-al-fiqh/i-lam-al-muwaqi-in-an-rabb-il-alamin-ibn-qayyim-al-jawziyyah.html.

Sintez, Cyril. ‘La Sanction Préventive En Droit de La Responsabilité Civile : Contribution à La Théorie de l’interprétation et de La Mise En Effet Des Normes.’ Thesis, Orléans, 2009. https://theses.fr/2009ORLE0002.

Sitaresmi, Adhisty, Mas Rahmah, Suparto Wijoyo, Adhitya Panji Anom, and Fatma Merve Prayogo. ‘Legal Frameworks for Cybersecurity and Data Protection in Cloud-Based Notarial Systems in Indonesia: An Intersectional Analysis of Positive Law and Islamic Legal Principles’. Al-’Adalah 22, no. 1 (2025): 29–62. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v22i1.26813.

Sugirman, Andi, Irfan Amir, Andri Sutrisno, Agnes Fitryantica, and Sholihin Bone. ‘Balancing Individual Political Rights and Institutional Integrity in an Islamic Constitutional Perspective on Party Switching in Indonesia’. El-Mashlahah 15, no. 2 (2025): 369–392. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.9995.

Surono, Danang Rahmat, and Gunawan Widjaja. ‘The Role Of Judicial Review In The Indonesian Legal System: A Literature Review On Constitutional Protection And Legal Accountability’. International Journal Of Humanities, Social Sciences And Business (INJOSS) 4, no. 3 (2025): 611–622.

Taufik, Muhammad, Alfan Miko, Indraddin, Bob Alfiandi, and Abdul Halim. ‘Reassessing the Legitimacy of Civil Disobedience: A Maqasid al-Shari’ah and Sociological Analysis of Legal Authority and Public Rejection of Government Policy’. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 11, no. 1 (2026): 139–157. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v11i1.14452.

Tymoshenko, Vira. ‘Essence and Purpose of Preventive and Punitive Functions of Legal Liability’. Ûridičnij Časopis Nacìonalʹnoï Akademìï Vnutrìšnìh Sprav 14, no. 4 (2024): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-chasopis/4.2024.23.

Widyawati, Fransiska, and Sumanto Al Qurtuby. ‘Suicide in Manggarai, Eastern Indonesia: Comparative Perspectives from Islamic, Catholic, and Indigenous Law’. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 20, no. 2 (2025): 393–422. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v20i2.15959.

Yassin, Mohamed. ‘Al-Masʾūliyyah al-Mawḍūʿiyyah ʿan al-Makhāṭir al-Mustaḥdathah” [Objective Liability for Emerging Risks]’. Benha Journal of Human Sciences, ahead of print, 1 January 2022. https://doi.org/10.21608/BJHS.1999.269405.