Contemporary Reassessment of Punishment in Islamic Sharia and Secular Law: A Comparative Study of Justice and Penal Philosophy

Authors

  • Anis Mashdurohatun Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang Indonesia
  • Eid Abed Alhaleem Maslat Harahsheh Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Irwan Datuiding Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Indonesia
  • Abun Hasbulloh Syambas Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Indonesia
  • Prasetiyo Adhi Wibowo Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.11887

Keywords:

Criminal; Justice; Law; Penal; Taʿzīr.

Abstract

This study offers a contemporary reassessment of punishment in Islamic Sharia and secular legal systems by comparatively examining their classifications, objectives, and underlying penal philosophies. While both frameworks seek to deter crime, uphold justice, and preserve social order, they diverge significantly in epistemological foundations, moral orientation, and modes of legal authority. Employing a qualitative comparative legal approach, this research integrates classical Islamic jurisprudence with contemporary statutory regulations and judicial practices. The analysis moves beyond doctrinal exposition to address current challenges in crime prevention, legal objectivity, proportionality, and the role of state authority in administering punishment. Particular attention is given to the ethical coherence and legitimacy of each system in responding to modern social complexities. The findings reveal that Islamic Sharia—especially through its taʿzīr framework—offers a principled yet flexible penal paradigm that balances deterrence, moral reform, and restorative considerations. Its emphasis on proportionality, judicial discretion, and ethical responsibility reflects a holistic vision of justice consistent with the objectives of the Maqāṣid al-Sharia. Conversely, contemporary secular legal systems increasingly prioritize rehabilitation and utilitarian efficiency but often encounter structural challenges, including sentencing disparities, systemic bias, and susceptibility to political or socioeconomic interests. This study contributes academically by enriching comparative penal theory through an integrative ethical analysis of Sharia and secular models. It demonstrates that Sharia’s justice-oriented framework provides valuable normative insights for contemporary penal reform, particularly in enhancing fairness, accountability, and moral balance within modern criminal justice systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Ahmad Badri. An Analysis of Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) as Applied Islamic Ethics | ICR Journal. 8 October 2020. https://icrjournal.org/index.php/icr/article/view/402.

Abooeshaghi, Mohsen Saeedi, Abdollah Bahmanpouri, and Seyyed Mahdi Jokar. ‘Comparative Study of the Punishment of “Imprisonment” in Modern Criminal Law and Islamic Law’. 25, no. 1 (March 2024): 95–126. https://doi.org/10.30497/law.2024.245370.3446.

Al-Farsi, Khaled. ‘Exploring Sharia Law in Islamic Jurisprudence’. Social Science Chronicle 2, no. 1 (October 2022): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.56106/ssc.2022.009.

Alia, Nur, Mohamad Subli, Apriyanti, and Nazhar. ‘Understanding and Implementing Islamic Law: Challenges and Solutions in Modern Contexts’. Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics 1, no. 2 (December 2024): 72–82. https://doi.org/10.63077/qgjzc372.

Amin, Mahir, Marli Candra, and Helga Nurmila Sari. ‘Punishment in Islamic Criminal Law: Between Facts and Ideals of Punishment’. Al-Jinayah : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 10, no. 1 (June 2024): 48–71. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2024.10.1.48-71.

Arafat, Muhammad, and Asmuni. ‘Implementation of Maqashid Al-Syariah in Islamic Criminal Law in Muslim Countries: A Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, and Indonesia’. AL-SULTHANIYAH 14, no. 1 (March 2025): 45–68. https://doi.org/10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v14i1.3577.

Candra, Marli. ‘The Penology of Islamic Criminal Law: Reintroduction of Islamic Penology’. Al-’Adalah 15, no. 2 (2018): 345–366. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v15i2.2783.

Danial, Danial. ‘Criminalisation in Islamic Penal Code: A Study of Principles, Criminalization Methods, and Declining Variations’. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 11, no. 3 (September 2023): 1005–1026. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i3.1058.

Djalaluddin, Muhammad Mawardi, Bulqia Mas’ud, Dedy Sumardi, Isnawardatul Bararah, and Kamus Kamus. ‘The Implementation of Ta’zīr Punishment as an Educational Reinforcement in Islamic Law’. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (March 2023): 399–417. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.15101.

Dzhansarayeva, R., and Meruert Kylishbaevna Bissenova. ‘The Concept and Signs of Punishment in Islamic Law’. 2014. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Concept-and-Signs-of-Punishment-in-Islamic-Law-Dzhansarayeva-Bissenova/80397aeba16e92261b10813b684f683c1974a6b6.

Ehirim, Ugochukwu Godspower. ‘Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare Delivery in Nigeria: Legal and Ethical Dimensions of Patients’ Rights to Safety’. Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Socio-Legal Studies 1, no. 1 (May 2025): 47–71. https://doi.org/10.24260/ijssls.1.1.10.

Eichbauer, Melodie H. ‘The Shaping and Reshaping of the Relationship between Church and State from Late Antiquity to the Present: A Historical Perspective through the Lens of Canon Law’. Religions 13, no. 5 (May 2022): 378. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050378.

Fasihi, Abdulkhaliq. ‘The Philosophy of Punishment in Islam and Statute’. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 11, no. 6 (June 2024): 258–271. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i6.5894.

Haq, Islamul. ‘Prison in Review of Islamic Criminal Law: Between Human and Deterrent Effects’. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 4, no. 1 (June 2020): 132–150. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i1.6683.

Hasbi, Yusrizal. ‘Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Filsafat’. Equality : Journal of Law and Justice 1, no. 2 (August 2024): 115–136. https://doi.org/10.69836/equality-jlj.v1i2.119.

Helaluddin, and Hengki Wijaya. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Sebuah Tinjauan Teori & Praktik. Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray, 2019.

‘Islamic Law As A Source of Legal Rules in the MENA Region | ElectronicPublications’. Accessed 15 November 2025. https://www.electronicpublications.org/stuff/1113.

Jhokio, Alizeh, Tansif Ur Rehman, and Kaleemullah. ‘Data Privacy Laws in Pakistan: A Comparative Analysis with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation’. Journal of Political Stability Archive 3, no. 2 (June 2025): 870–882. https://doi.org/10.63468/jpsa.3.2.48.

Kayadibi, Saim. ‘Reassessment of Human Rights in the Context of the Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘ah (High Objectives of Islamic Law)’. 1 (December 2018): 163–193. http://www.yenidendusunmek.com/.

Kurniawan, Itok Dwi, and Souad Ezzerouali. ‘Revisiting the Principle of Legal Certainty: A Contemporary Analysis through the Lens of Legal Positivism’. NUSANTARA: Journal of Law Studies 3, no. 02 (December 2024): 137–146. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17385496.

Mujib, Abdul. ‘Philosophy and Methodology In Islamic Law: Pendekatan Sistem Terhadap Teori Hukum Islam’. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah 3, no. 2 (October 2018). https://doi.org/10.30651/jms.v3i2.2089.

Nuraisyah, Nuraisyah. ‘Philosophical Dimensions of Punishment in Islamic Criminal Law’. Al-Hurriyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (August 2021): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.30983/alhurriyah.v6i1.3459.

Tc, Salman Faris. ‘Revisiting the Legacy of Islamic Legal Scholarship: The Influence of Sharia on Contemporary Legal Systems’. Al-Arfa: Journal of Sharia, Islamic Economics and Law 3, no. 1 (July 2025): 59–76. https://doi.org/10.61166/arfa.v3i1.96.

Widiartana, Gregorius, and Sajjad Hussain. ‘Judicial Pardon in Contemporary Criminal Verdicts: Balancing Justice, Legal Certainty, and the Utility of Law’. NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 4, no. 01 (July 2025): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17346796.

Yolanda, Vhadia, Ardiansyah, and Ari Widiyawati. ‘Beyond Formal Metrology: The Socio-Legal Construction of Traditional Measurement in Shellfish Trading within a Muslim Coastal Community in Tempurukan’. Indonesian Journal of Sharia and Socio-Legal Studies 1, no. 2 (November 2025): 111–131. https://doi.org/10.24260/ijssls.1.2.125.

Yusuf, Nasruddin, Ridwan Jamal, and Misbahul Munir Makka. ‘The Significance of Ushul Al-Fiqh and Maqashid Syari’ah Approaches in Reforming Islamic Law in Indonesia: A Critical Study of the Penal Code or Another Topic’. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 58, no. 2 (December 2024): 389–417. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v58i2.1450.

Zain, Muhammad Fuad, and Ahmad Zayyadi. ‘Measuring Islamic Legal Philosophy and Islamic Law: A Study of Differences, Typologies, and Objects of Study’. El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law, 2 January 2023, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v2i1.7472.

Zawawi, Mohamad Ridhuan Mohd, Wafaa’ Yusof, Zaini Nasohah, Anwar Fakhri Omar, and Safiyyah Hannah Souit. ‘Rethinking Hisbah and Sharia Proceduralism: A Comparative Approach to Justice in Contemporary Islamic Law’. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (May 2025): 234–268. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10391.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Contemporary Reassessment of Punishment in Islamic Sharia and Secular Law: A Comparative Study of Justice and Penal Philosophy. (2026). MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 5(1), 80-100. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.11887