Judicial Neutrality in Corruption Trials: A Contemporary Islamic Law Perspective on Independence in Transitional Legal Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11425Keywords:
Corruption Trials, Judicial Neutrality, Legal Reform, Public Trust, Transitional Legal Systems.Abstract
This study examines the dynamics of judicial neutrality in corruption trials within transitional legal systems, analysed through the lens of Contemporary Islamic Law. The research aims to investigate how political pressures, systemic weaknesses, and legal culture affect judicial independence, and to evaluate the alignment of judicial conduct with the ethical and procedural principles embedded in Islamic legal thought. Employing a qualitative legal research method that draws on statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, the study synthesises legal texts, judicial decisions, and scholarly commentaries. The findings reveal that in transitional legal systems, judicial neutrality is often compromised by political interference, inadequate institutional safeguards, and cultural tolerances toward corruption, resulting in a crisis of public trust. From the perspective of Contemporary Islamic Law, the preservation of judicial independence is not only a procedural requirement but also a moral imperative grounded in maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, particularly the protection of justice (ḥifẓ al-‘adl) and public interest (maṣlaḥah' āmmah). The study concludes that integrating Contemporary Islamic legal principles into anti-corruption judicial reforms can strengthen institutional independence, reinforce ethical accountability, and restore public confidence in the judiciary. This research contributes academically by bridging the discourse between legal reform in transitional contexts and the evolving application of Islamic legal theory to contemporary governance challenges.
Downloads
References
Adhita, Mellani Mugia. ‘Independensi Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Perkara Pengujian Uu Yang Memuat Conflict Of Interest Pada Putusan Mk No 90/Puu-Xxi/2023’. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 02 (2023). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/nusantara/article/view/440.
Aldo, Aldo, Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena, and Richard Marsilio Waas. ‘Zona Netral Dan Akibat Hukum Menurut Hukum Internasional’. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2023): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i1.1547.
Alwi, Bashori, A. Hirzan Anwari, and Arman Arman. ‘Wawasan Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam’. Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam 5, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v5i1.1983.
Anwar, Syamsul. ‘Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam’. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 15, no. 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss1.art8.
Bungin, Burhan. Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Çali, Başak. 'On Interpretivism and International Law'. European Journal of International Law 20, no. 3 (2009): 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp038.
Gunawan, Hendra. ‘Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam’. Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi 4, no. 2 (2019): 182–199. https://doi.org/10.24952/yurisprudentia.v4i2.1506.
Laksana, Andri Winjaya, Muhammad Ridwan Lubis, Denny Suwondo, Muhammad Ngazis, and Ratih Mega Puspa Sari. 'Integrating Maqasid Al-Sharī’ah in Contemporary Islamic Legal Reform on Drug Policy'. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (2025): 416–439. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10665.
Lingga, Asma Ulhusna Br, Raihanah Azalia, Dwi Novalia, Intan Sakinah Aulia, Ghifari Nayaka Putra, and Tasya Ananda Kurniawan. ‘Implementasi Hukum Jinayah Dalam Menangani Kejahatan Korupsi Perspektif Syariah’. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 9, no. 1 (2025): 4495–504.
Mahfudh, Nur Iqbal. ‘Hukum Pidana Islam Tentang Korupsi’. IN RIGHT: Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Azazi Manusia 6, no. 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.14421/inright.v6i2.1453.
Maulida, Ali, Didin Hafidhuddin, Ulil Amri Syafri, and Abas Mansur Tamam. ‘Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia dan Pidana Islam’. Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial 8, no. 01 (2020): 43–67. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v8i01.677.
Miles, Matthew B, and A. Michael Huberman. Analisis Data Kualitatif : Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Universitas Indonesia Press, 2014.
Pa, Esra Julita BR, Gaby Agustina Nainggolan, Desy Yolanda Br Bangun, and Syuratty A. Rahayu Manalu. ‘Analisis Strategi Pencegahan Korupsi Menurut Perspektif Hukum Islam Dalam Implementasi Asas Legalitas Tindak Pidana: Hukum Islam Dalam Konteks Pencegahan Korupsi’. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 1, no. 4 (2023): 268–679. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v1i4.646.
Rasji, Namira Diffany Nuzan, Putri Meilika Nadilatasya, and Sherley Lie. ‘Netralitas Majelis Kehormatan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Menegakkan Kode Etik Hakim: Kajian Perbandingan dengan Komisi Yudisial’. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 5, no. 10 (2024). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v5i10.932.
Rasji, Rasji, Fathimathuz Zachra De Chaniago, and Feny Bobyanti. ‘Optimalisasi Pengawasan Kode Etik Hakim Konstitusi Berbasis Internal Department of Court Administration Guna Menjamin Clean and Good Judicial’. SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law 2, no. 1 (2025): 658–667. https://doi.org/10.57235/sakola.v2i1.5889.
Rayfindratama, Alva Dio. ‘Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan di Pengadilan’. Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara 1, no. 2 (2023): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i2.409.
Rayfindratama, Alva Dio. ‘Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Di Pengadilan’. Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara 1, no. 2 (2023): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i2.409.
S, Kusnu Goesnadhie. ‘Prinsip Pengawasan Independensi Hakim’. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 14, no. 3 (2007). https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/1083.
S, Kusnu Goesnadhie. ‘Prinsip Pengawasan Independensi Hakim’. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 14, no. 3 (2007). https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/1083.
Siroj, Malthuf. ‘Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Strategi Pemberantasannya’. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 11, no. 2 (2016): 293–312. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v11i2.1038.
Triyudiana, Andra, Ahmad Solehudin, Azhary Fathama, and Nabilla Putri Aryani. ‘Netralitas Profesi Hakim Di Tengah Intervensi Politik’. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 1, no. 01 (2022). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/98.
Triyudiana, Andra, Ahmad Solehudin, Azhary Fathama, and Nabilla Putri Aryani. ‘Netralitas Profesi Hakim Di Tengah Intervensi Politik’. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 1, no. 01 (2022). https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/98.
Walangitan, Semuel. ‘Independensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Tengah Tekanan Politik’. Indonesia of Journal Business Law 4, no. 2 (2025): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijbl.v4i2.6596.
Waris, Irwan, Ani Susanti, Dandan Haryono, Bayu Rahmat Ramadhan, and Sri Nur Akifa. 'Reframing Public Policy on Narcotic Case Dismissals: Integrating Maqasid al-Sharī'ah and Restorative Justice in the Contemporary Era'. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (2025): 566–596. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10579.
Zahra, Adinda Thalia, Aditia Sinaga, and Muhammad Rafli Firdausi. ‘Problematika Independensi Hakim Sebagai Pelaksana Kekuasaan Kehakiman’. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. 2 (2023): 2009–2025. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.303.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Irman Syahriar, Indera Dewi, Fifi Loanardy, Jamil Khairunnisah, Bilal Hussain

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







