Menggagas Fikih Tahkim Indonesia

Authors

  • Isa Ansori IAIN Metro Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/adzkiya.v9i01.3107

Keywords:

Fiqih Tahkim, Arbitration, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Non-Ligitasi

Abstract

Fiqh is a legal product as a result of Mujtahid's thinking and understanding againts a particular legal case. The fiqh will continuesly develop along with the changes in place and time. Fikihtahkim is compiled by the ulama as a procedure for resolving conflicts outside the court. Some provisions of classical tahkim jurisprudence such as an arbitrator must be Muslim, it cannot be an infidel, a slave, an infidel zimmi, a person subject to qazaf, and wicked people, or an arbitrator must be in the same mazhab with the people or parties whose conflicts are being resolved, it could be not appropriate if applied in Indonesia, because the provisions like this are not generally carried out in the tradition of arbitration in Indonesia, so they require adjustments. These facts require Islamic jurists in Indonesia to reformulate the fiqhtahkim that consider the situation, conditions and culture of the Indonesian people. It should consider the practices of traditional arbitration wich has become as culture in society.

References

Abdullah bin Mahmūd bin Maudūd Al-Mūṣaliya, Al-IkhtiyārLita’līl Al-Mukhtār, MaktabahSyamilah, 20
AbūBakr bin Alī bin Muhammad Al-Hadādī Al-Ibādī Al-YamanīAl-Zabīdī, Al-Jauharah Al-Nirah, MaktabahSyamilah, 23/6; 24/6.
Abu Bakr bin Mas’ūd bin Ahmad Al-Kāsānī ‘Alau Al-Din, Badā’i’ Al-Ṣanāi’ fīTartīb Al-Sharā’i’, MaktabahSyamilah, 417/14
Ahmad Rofiq, Pembaharuan Hukum Islam di Indonesia,Yogyakarta: Gama Media, 2001
Al-Ghazāli, al-Mustaṣfā min ‘ilmal-Uṣūl, Juz I, t.t.: Dāral-Fikr, t.t.
Al-Shāṭibī, al-MuwāfaqātfiUṣūlal-Sharī’ah, Juz I, Beirut: Dāral-Ma’rifah, t.t.
Asafri Jaya Bakri, “Konsep Maqasidal-Syari’ah dalam Pandangan al- Syâtibî”, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996
Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia, “Berdamailah di BANI: Arbitrase Mengedepankan Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Damai, Bukan Sekedar Memutus Perkara atau Perselisihan”, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol20204/berdamailah-di-bani (diakses 30 April 2016)
Chamim Tohari, “Fiqh Keindonesiaan: Transformasi Hukum Islam dalam Sistem Tata Hukum di Indonesia” (ANALISIS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Volume 15, No. 2, Desember 2015), 403
DamintoDanansuryo, Penyelesaian Sengketa Perjanjian pada Lembaga Keuangan Syariah melalui Basyarnas, Jakarta: Kosentrasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2016
Erman Suparman, Pilihan Forum Arbitrase Dalam Sengketa Komersial Untuk Penegakan Keadilan”, disertasi Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro, 2004
Fakhru Al-DīnUthmān bin Ali Al-Zaila’ī, Tabyin Al-Haqāiq: SyarhKanz Al-Daqāiq, MaktabahSyamilah, 131/12.
Fakhru Al-DīnUthmān bin Ali Al-Zaila’ī, Tabyin Al-Haqāiq: SyarhKanz Al-Daqāiq, MaktabahSyamilah, 130/12.
Gary Goodpaster, A guide to Mediation and Negotiation, (Transnational Press Inc., 1977) Chapter, 16.
Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy, Syari’at Islam Menjawab Tantangan Zaman, Yogyakarta: IAIN Sunan Kalijaga, 1961
Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqiy,Beberapa Permasalahan Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Tintamas, 1975
Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqiy,Dinamika dan Elastisitas Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Tintamas, 1975
Hasbi Ash-Shiddiqiy,Syari’at Islam Menjawab Tantangan Zaman, Yogyakarta: IAIN Sunan Kalijaga, 1961
I Gede A.B. Wiranata, Hukum Adat Indonesia: Perkembangannya dari Masa ke Masa, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005
Jimmy Joses Sembiring, Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan: Negosiasi, Mediasi, Konsiliasi, & Arbitrase, penyunting, Zulfa Simatur, Jakarta: Visimedia, 2011
Kamal Al-Dīn Muhammad bin Abd Al-Wāhid Al-Sīwāsī, Ibn Al-Hamām, Fath Al-Qadīr, MaktabahSyamilah, 446/16;
Kamaruddin, dkk., “Model Penyelesaian Konflik di Lembaga Adat”,Walisongo, Volume 21, Nomor 1, Mei 2013, 53.
Mahsun Fuad, Hukum Islam Indonesia: Dari Nalar Partisipatoris hingga Emansipatoris, Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2005
MohMukri, “DinamikaPemikiranFikihMazhab Indonesia (Perspektif Sejarah Sosial)” Analisis, Volume XI, Nomor 2, Desember 2011
Muhammad Alāu Al-Dīn bin Ali Al-Haṣkafī, Al-Dar Al-Mukhtār: SyarhTanwīr Al-Abṣārfī Fiqh Mazhab Al-Imām Abi Hanifah, MaktabahSyamilah, 576/5;
Muhammad Arifin, Prinsip Arbitrase Berbasis Syariah dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah, Medan: Program Doktor (S-3) Ilmu Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2014
Muhammad bin Muhammad Al-Bābaratī, Al-‘Ināyah: Syarh Al-Hidāyah, MaktabahSyamilah, 294/10.
Niken Dyah Tiana, Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Tesis Fakultas Hukum Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Indonesia Depok: Fakultas Hukum Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Indonesia, 2011
Panduan Bantuan Hukum di Indonesia: Pedoman Anda Memahami dan Menyelesaikan Masalah Hukum,Jakarta: Yayasan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Indonesia, 2007
Sahal Mahfudz, NuansaFiqhSosial, Yogyakarta: LKiS, 1994
Salim, Erlies Septiana Nurbani, Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Disertasi dan Tesis (Buku Kedua), Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014
Shamsu Al-DīnAbūBakr Muhammad bin AbīSahl Al-Sarkhasī, Al-Mabsūṭ, Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 2000, MaktabahSyamilah, 211/16.
Sosiologi hukum dalam perubahan. Antonius Cahyadi dan Donny Danardono (ed)., Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2009
Susanti Adi Nugroho, Penyelesaian sengketa Arbritase dan penerapan hukumnya, Jakarta: Kencana, 2015
Uthmān bin Alī Al-Bāri’i, Fakhru Al-Dīn Al-Zaila’ī, Tabyin Al-Haqāiq: SyarhKanz Al-DaqāiqwaHāsyiah Al-Syilbī, Kairo: Al-Maṭba’ah Al-Kubrá Al-Amiriyah, 1313, MaktabahSyamilah, 193/4.
Wahbah bin Mustafa Al-Zuhaili, Al-Fiqh Al-IslāmīwaAdillatuhu, Damaskus: Dār Al-Fikr, t.t, MaktabahSyamilah 365/8
Zain al-Dīn bin Ibrāhīm bin Najīm, Al-Bahr al-Rāiq: SyarhKanzal-Daqāiq, MaktabahSyamilah, 29/18

Downloads

Published

2021-07-05

How to Cite

Menggagas Fikih Tahkim Indonesia. (2021). Adzkiya : Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Syariah, 9(01), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.32332/adzkiya.v9i01.3107