MEMAHAMI KONSEP ISLAM REVISIONIS UN’IM SIRRY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32332/nizham.v10i1.6851Keywords:
understanding, concept, revisionist islam, munim sirryAbstract
The argument of this article is that the revisionist Islamic ideas and concepts popularized by Mun'im Sirry in Indonesia is an academic work that invites Islamic scholars to re-examine Islamic sources in order to find historical truth. For Mun'im Sirry Islam believed by Muslims has not been able to distinguish between historical facts and theological beliefs. The findings of this study are that Mun'im Sirry supports several theses of previous revisionist scholars such as John Wansbourgh and Ignaz Goldziher regarding the many historical distortions, teachings and rituals of Muslims which are actually different from early Islamic practice. However, Mun'im Sirry has his own unique revisionist concept of Islam. One of the factors causing this bias is because Muslims accept Islamic sources as taken for granted, that Islam is a religion that has been perfected. An important point for disseminating revisionist Islamic ideas is that new facts and interpretations are very important to support the construction of a tolerant, dialogical attitude in order to create a religious community that can live side by side and work together.
Downloads
References
Akh Minhaji. Sejarah Sosial dalam Studi Islam Teori, Metodologi dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Suka Press, 2013.
Galadari, Abdulla. “Controversies over Islamic Origins: An Introduction to Traditionalism and Revisionism: by Mun’im Sirry, Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars, 2021, 344 pp.,£ 64.99 (hardback), ISBN 978-1-5275-6821-1.” Taylor & Francis, 2022.
Haikal Fadhil Anam. “Konsep Kafir dalam Alquran: Studi Atas Penafsiran Asghar Ali Engineer.” Nalar: Jurnal Peradaban dan Pemikiran Islam 2, no. 2 (2018): 89–97.
Hidayat, Robist, dan Nadya Rizky. “Kemunculan Islam dalam Kesarjanaan Revisionis.” Afkaruna 15, no. 1 (2019): 135–40. https://doi.org/10.18196/aiijis.2019.0099.135-139.
Ihwan Agustono. “Potret Perkembangan Metodologi Kelompok Orientalis Dalam Studi Al-Qur’an.” Studia Quranika: Jurnal Studi Quran 4, no. 2 (2019): 159–80.
Mu’ammar Zayn Qadafy. “Kontroversi Islam Revisionis: David S. Powers, Zayd Ibn Harithah dan Tertutupnya Pintu Kenabian.” Nun 4, no. 1 (2018): 45–81.
Muhammad Azhar. “Telaah Buku Kontroversi Islam Awal.” Jurnal Tarjih 13, no. 2 (2016): 207–11.
Mukhlisin Saad. “Narasi Islam Awal dan Problem Otentisitas al-Qur’an: Telaah terhadap Pemikiran Fred Donner.” Surabaya, 2017.
Mun’im Sirry. “https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=TKrDSBgAAAAJ&hl=id&oi=sra,” n.d.
———. Rekonstruksi Islam Historis: Pergumulan Kesarjanaan Mutakhir. Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Press, 2021.
Najafabadi, S. Adel Hashemi. “The invention of Islamic history.” International Journal of the Humanities, 2010. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/cgp/v08i01/42810.
Rahman, Yusuf. “Pendekatan Tradisionalis dan Revisionis dalam Kajian Sejarah Pembentukan Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir pada Masa Islam Awal.” Journal of Qur’an and Hadith Studies 4, no. 1 (2015): 129–45. https://doi.org/10.15408/quhas.v4i1.2286.
Sirry, Mun’im. “Fighting Words: Religion, Violence, and the Interpretation of Sacred Texts.” JSTOR, 2016.
———. “Islam Revisionis Kontestasi Agama Zaman Radikal.” Yogyakarta: Suka Press, 2018.
———. “Kemunculan Islam dalam Kesarjanaan Revisionis.” Yogyakarta: Suka Press, 2017.
———. “Kontroversi Islam Awal: Antara Mazhab Tradisionalis dan Revisionis.” Bandung: Mizan, 2015.
———. “Polemik Kitab Suci.” Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia, 2013.
———. “Tradisi Intelektual Islam: Rekonfigurasi Sumber Otoritas Agama.” Malang: Madani, 2015.
———. “Who Are Those in Authority? Early Muslim Exegesis of the Qur’anic Ul u’l-Amr. Religions 12: 483.” s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published …, 2021.
Sirry, Mun’im A. “Early Muslim–Christian dialogue: a closer look at major themes of the theological encounter.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 16, no. 4 (2005): 361–76.
Sirry, Munʾim. “The Early Development of the Quranic Ḥanīf.” Journal of Semitic Studies 56, no. 2 (2011): 345–66.
Umi Wasilatul Firdausiyah. “Tafsir Modern Perspektif Mun’im Sirry dalam What’s Modern about Modern Tafsir? A Closer Look at Hamka’s Tafsir al-Azhar.” Nun 6, no. 2 (2020): 83–115.
