MEMAHAMI HADIS MAYIT DI SIKSA SEBAB TANGISAN KELUARGANYA

Authors

  • Isa Ansori

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/nizham.v8i01.2123

Keywords:

Hadith Criticism, Matan Criticism, Mayit, Torture

Abstract

Hadith has an important position as the source of the second law after the Qur'an. It is often found that some of the hadith texts appear to conflict with each other either with the text of the hadith itself or the Qur'an. A person especially a hadith and / or legal expert needs to have the ability to complete the texts of the hadith or the Qur'an which sometimes seem to conflict with one another. The hadith about the deceased was tortured because of the crying of his family, is one example of a hadith that is contrary to the word of God that one cannot bear the guilt of others. With the approach of matan criticism (ilmnaqdal-matan), it is obtained that if the text of the hadith contradicts the Qur'anic texts, then the texts because of their qath'i values ​​must be prioritized. Meanwhile, if resolved using the science of mukhtalifal-hadīth, the conflict can be resolved through two ways, namely: First, through al-jam'u which is to compromise these two conflicting traditions, as practiced by Imam Bukhari who explained that the weeping that causes torture is a cry which is traditionalized and done with lamentation; Secondly, through superstitious means, namely maintaining textual understanding of hadith as understood by Umar and Ibn Umar and ignoring the history of Aisha's traditions, is that the deceased was tortured because of the crying of her family, or choosing the hadith as understood by Aisha by ignoring the understanding of Umar and Ibn Umar , as did the critics of Matan Hadith.

References

Abd al-Majid Bairum, Ikhtilaf Riwayat al-HadīthwaAtharuhfī Ikhtilaf al-Fuqahā, Amman: al-Jami’ahal-Urduniyah, 1990.
Abd al-Wahab Khallaf, ‘IlmUshulal-Fiqh, Jakarta: al-Majlisal-‘A’laal-Indonesia li al-Da’wahal-Islamiyyah, 1972.
Abdul Majid Khon, Ulumul Hadis, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012.
Abu al-Faḍl Ahmad bin ‘Ali bin Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Ḥajaral-Asqalānī, Fatḥal-bāriSyarḥṢaḥīḥal-Bukhāriy, juz 4.
Abu al-Faḍl Ahmad bin ‘Ali bin Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Hajar al-‘Asqalāniy, Tahdhībal-Tahdhīb, diambil dari softwareMaktabah Syamilah.
Abu Ishaq Ibrahim bin Musa al-Syatibi, al-MuwafaqatfiUshulal-Syari’ah, disyarah oleh ‘Abd Allah Darras, Mesir: Al-Maktabahal-Tijariyyahal-Kubra, t.th. Juz 3.
AbūMuhaḥamma ‘Abdullah bin Muslim bin Qutaybahal-Dīnūrī, Ta’wīlMukhtalifal-Ḥadīt, t.t.: Al-Maktab al-IslāmĪ-Mu’asasahal-‘Ishrāq, 1999
Ahmad bin ‘Abd Al-Rahman bin Muhammad Al-Banā Al-Sā’ānī, Al-Fath al-Rabbānī li TartībMusnad Al-Imām Ahmad bin Hanbal Al-ShaybānĪwaMa’ahuBulugh Al-Amānī Min Asrār Al-Fath Al-Rabānī Juz 7, t.t.: DārIhyā’ Al-Turāt Al-‘Arabī, t.th.
Ajjaj Al-Khatib, As-SunnahQabl At-Tadwin.
Ali ‘Abd Al-BasiṭMazīd, Manhāj Al-Muhadithīnfīal-Qarnal-Awwal al-Hijrīwa Hatta ‘Iṣrināal-Hādhīr, t.t.: Al-Hayah al-Miṣriyyahal-‘Āmmahlilkitāb, t.th.
Al-Muẓāhirī, Muhammad Thanāullah, Al-Tafsīr Al-MuẓāhirĪ, ,juz 9, Pakistan: Maktabah Al-Rushdiyah, 1412 H.
Arif Wahyudi, “Kontroversi Hadits-Hadits Menangisi Mayat Dalam Perspektif Mukhtalif Hadits,” Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial 9, no. 1 (November 27, 2014).
H.M. Syuhudi Ismail, Hadis Nabi Menurut Pembela, Pengingkar dan Pemalsunya, Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1995.
Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqi, Sejarah dan Pengantar Ilmu Hadis, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1980.
Hasjim Abbas, Kritik Matan Hadis: Versi Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha, Yogyakarta: Teras, 2004.
IbnBiṭāl Abu al-Hasan ‘Ali bin Khalaf bin Abd Al-Malik, Sharhal-Bukhārī, juz 5.
Ibnu Biṭāl Abu Al-Hasan Ali bin Khalaf bin ‘Abd Al-Malik, SharhSaḥīhAl-Bukhāri li IbnBiṭāl,Riyaḍ: Maktabah Al-Rashid, 2003.
Ibrāhīm bin Mūsa bin Muhammad al-Lakhamīal-gharnāṭīash-shahīrbial-Shāṭibī, Al-Muwāfaqāt, Juz 4, t.t. : DārIbn ‘Afān, 1997.
Idri, Studi Hadis, Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Kamaruddin Amin, Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis, Jakarta: Penerbit Hikmah, 2009.
M. Achwan Baharuddin, “Visi-Misi Ma’ani Al-Hadith Dalam Wacana Studi Hadith,”Tafaqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman, vol. 2, no. 2 (2014).
M. Syuhudi Ismail, Hadis Nabi Menurut Pembela, Pengingkar dan Pemalsunya, Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1995.
M. Syuhudi Ismail, Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1988.
M. Syuhudi Ismail, Metodologi Penelitian Hadis, Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1992.
Manna al-Qaththan, Pengantar Ilmu Hadits, penerjemah Mifdhol Abdurrahman, Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2005.
Mausu’ahal-Hadīthal-Sharīfal-Iṣdāral-Thānī 2000 yang dikeluarkan oleh Global Islamic Software Company 1991-1997.
Muhammad al-Ghazali, al-Sunat al-Nabawiyat Baina Ahli al-Fiqh wa Ahli al-Hadits
Muhammad bin ‘Ali bin ‘Adam bin Mūsāal-‘Ityūbīal-Walallawī, Sharḥ Sunan Al-Nasā’īy Al-MusammaDhakhīrat Al-‘UqbāfīSyarh Al-Mujtabījuz 18, t.t.: DārālBurūmlinnashrwaal-Tawzī’, 2003.
Muhammad bin Ibrāhīm bin Jamā’ah, Al-Manhalal-RawīfīMukhtaṣar ‘Ulūmal-Ḥadīthal-Nabawī, Damaskus: Dāral-Fikr, 1406 H.
Muhammad bin Idrīsal-Syāfi’ī Abu Abdullah, al-Risālah, Beirut: Dāral-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, t.th .
Muhammad bin Makarim bin Manẓūral-Afrīqīal-Miṣrī, Lisānal-‘Arab, Juz 13, Beirut: Dārẓādir, t.th.
Muhammad bin Makarim bin Manẓūral-Afrīqīal-Miṣrī, Lisānal-‘Arab, Juz 3, Beirut: Dārẓādir, t.th.
Muhammad bin Yusuf bin Ali bin Sa’īd, Shamsal-Dīnal-KirmānĪ, Al-Kawākibal-DarārĪfĪSharḥṢaḥĪḥal-BukhārĪ, juz 7, Beirut: DārIhyā’ al-turātal-‘Arabī, 1981
Muhammad Sholikhin, Hadis Asli Hadis Palsu: Studi Kasus Syekh MM Al-A’zami, Ph.D dalam Mengungkap Otentitas Hadis, Yogyakarta: Garudhawaca, 2012.
Muhammad Thahir al-Jawabi, Juhudal-MuhaddisinfīNaqd Matan al-Hadīthal-Nabawi, t.t.: Muassasat ‘Abdul Karim Ibn Abdullah, t.th.
Mula Nur al-Din Abu al-Hasan al-Qāri, SyarhNukhbahal-Fikr,Jil. 1, Beirut: Dāral-Arqām, t.th.
Munzier Suparta, Ilmu Hadis, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Mushtafaal-Siba’i, al-SunnahwaMakanatuhafial-Tashri’ al-Islami, t.t. : Dar al-Qaumiyyah, 1966.
Nawir Yuslem, Ulumul Hadis, Jakarta: Mutiara Sumber Widya, 2003.
Nur al-Dīn ‘Atar, Manhajal-Naqdfī ‘Ulūmal-ḥadīth, Damaskus: Dāral-Fikr, 1997.
Shamsual-DīnAbūal-Khayr Muhammad bin ‘Abd al-Rahman bin AbīBakr bin ‘Uthmān bin Muhammad al-Sakhāwī, Fath al-MughīthBisharhal-Fiyatal-Hadīth lil ‘Irāqī, Juz 1, Mesir: Maktabahal-Sunnah, 2003.
Software Kitab 9 Imam yang dibuat oleh Lidwa Pusaka i-software.
Subhan Nurdin, Benarkah Isa dan Dajjal akan turun?, Jakarta: QultumMedia, 2006.
Syamsul Anwar, Pemikiran Usul Fikih Al-Gazzālī (450-505 / 1058-1111), Yogyakarta: Penerbit Suara Muhammadiyah, 2015.
Syaraf al-Qudhāt, IlmMukhtalifHadīth: UṣuluhwaQawāiduh, Amman: al-Jami’ahal-‘Urduniyah, 2001.
Ṭāhir Al-Jazāirī Al-Dimsyqī, Taujih, al-NaẓriIlā ‘Uṣūlal-‘Athar, Halb: Maktabah Al-Maṭbū’ātal-Islāmiyyah, 1995, Juz 1.
Yusuf ‘Abdullah Al-Qaraḍāwiy, KaifaNata’āmalMa’aal-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah: Ma’ālimwaḍawābiṭ, Mesir: Dār Al-Wafā’ Liṭṭabā’ahwaal-Nashrwaal-Tawzī’, 1993.
Zuhad, Metode Pemahaman Hadis Mukhtalif dan Asbabal-Wurud, Semarang: RaSAIL Media Group, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-02