Sociolinguistics Of Disabled Verses In The Qur’an (Reconstruction of Disabled Status in Islam)

Authors

  • Arip Dwi Iskandar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32332/qeab4y14

Keywords:

Sociolinguistics, Diffable people, Status Reconstruction

Abstract

This research aims to examine the reconstruction of the status of people with disabilities (disabled) from an Islamic perspective by using a sociolinguistic approach to verses from the Qur’an relating to disabled people. The background to this research is the gap between Islam's progressive understanding of people with disabilities and the stigma and discrimination that people with disabilities still often experience in the Muslim community. The theoretical framework used is sociolinguistic theory. The research method used is qualitative content analysis of verses from the Qur’an that discuss disabilities. The research results show that the Qur’an gives high appreciation and respect to people with disabilities, but their understanding and treatment in Muslim society are often distorted by stigma and misconceptions. This research emphasizes the importance of reconstructing the understanding of Al-Qur'an verses related to disabilities so that they are in line with the principles of justice, equality, and inclusion taught by Islam.

Keywords: Sociolinguistics; Disabled people in the Qur’an;  Status Reconstruction

References

Adlini, Miza Nina. “Pendidikan Inklusi Dalam Al-Qur’an Q.S Abasa Ayat 1-11.” Tarbiatuna: Journal of Islamic Education Studies 4, no. 1 (2023): 52–63.

Afriyandi, Rikho, and Fadli Rahman. “Diffable Dalam Kitab Tafsir Indonesia Kontemporer.” Studi Keislaman 1, no. 2 (2020): 80–88. http://e-journal.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/index.php/syams.

Al-‘A>mah, Jumhu>riyyah Misr al-‘Arabiyyah Majma’i al_Lughoh. Mu’jam Al-Fa>dz Al-Qur’an Al-Kari>m. Mesir: Ida>roh al-‘A>mah li al-Mu’jama>t wa Ihya> at-Turats, 1998.

Al-Aṣfahānī, Al-Rāghib. Mu`jam Mufradāt Alfāẓ Al-Qur`ān. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, n.d.

Alkhazaali, Musaab, Husam Rashid, and Fatimah Shaheed. “Women Rights in the Glorious Qur’an : A Sociolinguistic Study.” Kufa Journal of Arts 1, no. 46 (2021): 739–52. https://doi.org/10.36317/kaj/2021/v1.i46.674.

Amin, Muhammad. “Relasi Sosial Dalam Al-Qur’an.” QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies 1, no. 1 (2022): 30–47. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v1i1.523.

Arina Alfiani, and Sulaiman. “HAK-HAK KAUM DIFFABLE DALAM AL-QUR’AN: Meneladani Kisah Pada QS. ‘Abasa (80)1-10.” Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam 7, no. 2 (2022): 167–86. https://doi.org/10.14421/mjsi.72.2967.

Azima, Fauzan. “SEMANTIK AL-QUR’AN (Sebuah Metode Penafsiran).” Tajdid: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman I, no. 1 (2017): 45–73.

Fernando, Henky, Yuniar Galuh Larasati, and Novita Cahyani. “Being #wanitasalihah: Representations of Salihah Women on TikTok.” IAS Journal of Localities 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.62033/iasjol.v1i1.8.

Ghazala, Hasan Said. A Dictionary of Stylistic and Rhetoric. Malta: Elga Publication, 2000.

Handayana, Sri. “Diffable Dalam Alquran.” Inklusi 3, no. 2 (2016): 267. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.030206.

Hedayet, Nagwa. “Re Thinking Al Qur an Contextuality and Linguistic Meaning.” First Symposium on Rethinking Al Qur’an Research I Nst Itute for Philosophical Foundat Ion of Disciplines, 2013.

https://www.academia.edu/6961346/Re_thinking_al_Qur_an_Contextuality_and_Linguistic_Meaning.

Irwandi, Irwandi. “The Qur’anic Concept on Human Language: A Preliminary Study on Science-Religion Integration in Studying Sociolinguistics.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 178, no. ICoIE 2018 (2019): 512–16. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoie-18.2019.110.

Jazeri, Mohamad. Sosiolinguistik: Ontologi, Epistemologi & Aksiologi. Tulungagung: Akademia Pustaka, 2017.

Julijanto, Muhammad. “Perempuan Diffable Berhadapan Hukum.” Muwazah 10, no. 2 (2018): 183–97. https://doi.org/10.28918/muwazah.v10i2.1785.

Keraf, Gorys. Diksi Dan Gaya Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1996.

Kristianto, Paulus Eko. “Pengembangan Inklusifitas Bagi Diffable Melalui Dakwah Dalam Kerangka Filosofis Islam Kontemporer.” Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran Dan Dakwah Pembangunan 1, no. 2 (2018): 321. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2017.012-06.

Losi, Rizky Vita. Konsep Dasar Linguistik. Linguistik : Teori Dan Pendekatannya, 2021.

Maghfiroh, Anisa Yaumil. “PENGGUNAAN BAHASA KRAMA INGGIL DALAM PENYIFATAN ALLAH (Kajian Sosiolinguistik Dan Pragmatik Dalam Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-Ibriz Karya Bisri Mustofa).” Skripsi 01, no. 01 (2023): 1–22.

Mufti, A. “Disability in the Islamic Tradition.” Religion Compass 11 (2017).

Muttaqin, Ahmad. “Etika Sosial Terhadap Diffable Netra: Analisis Semantik Alquran.” Inklusi 6, no. 1 (2019): 71. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.060104.

Regan, Vera. “Sociolinguistics and Language Learning in a Study Abroad Context.” Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 4, no. 1 (1998): 61–90. https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v4i1.63.

Rickford, John R. “The Need for New Approaches to Social Class Analysis in Sociolinguistics.” Language and Communication, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(86)90024-8.

Ruslan, H. “Language Variation Analysis of Expressions of Al-Quran Word Wife.” Research on Humanities and Social Sciences 4, no. 11 (2014): 143–50.

Siregar, Iskandarsyah. “Epistemological Challenges Against Sociolinguistics.” International Journal of Linguistics Studies 1, no. 2 (2021): 37–42. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2021.1.2.6.

Sugiyono. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D. 2nd ed. Bandung: Alfabetabta Bandung, 2020.

Tambunan, Syafrianto. “Agama Dan Kelompok Minoritas: Pendekatan Konseling Dalam Kasus Difabe.” AL-IRSYAD: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam 2, no. 2 (2020): 265–82.

Taufiqurrochman. Leksikologi Bahasa Arab. Malang: UIN – Malang press, 2008.

Umam, Muhammad Miftahul, and Ridwan Arifin. “Aksesabilitas Kaum Diffable Dalam Perlindungan Hukumnya Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum 18, no. 1 (2020): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v18i1.1089.

Yulianti, Eka, Bastian Zulyeno, and Muhammad Nikman Naser. “Sociolinguistics as a Method to Interpret the Physical Existence of Heaven and Hell in the Qur’an.” OCERI 2023 1 (2024): 240–52. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-108-1_23.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-03